We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Ilex Sign&go based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."This is a complete solution that can detect cyber attacks well."
"CyberArk PAM can be easily automated."
"The credentials management capability is key to ensuring that the credentials are kept secure and that access to them is done on a temporary and event-driven basis."
"We are utilizing CyberArk to secure applications, credentials, and endpoints."
"On the customer accounts side, our account managers are responsive. If you ask them, they will get you whomever you need."
"Increased our insight into how privileged accounts are being used and distributed within our footprint."
"It is a robust product."
"CyberArk has the ability to change the credentials on every platform."
"The on-premises deployment meets restrictions and the end-user is able to control all the configuration in their own IT environment."
"I would love them to improve their UI customizing features."
"Some aspects of the administration need improvement, though they have recently made improvements to the API. However, the management with the interface and configuration are not so user-friendly. It has not changed much during all the years that CyberArk has been on the market. The management part, like platform management as well as PSM connectors definition and management, could be improved, even if it has already been done with the API."
"The initial setup has room for improvement to be more straightforward."
"We need a bit more education for our user community because they are not using it to its capabilities."
"This is probably a common thing, but they do ask for a lot of log files, a lot of information. They ask you to provide a lot of information to them before they're willing to give you anything at all upfront. It would be better if they were a little more give-and-take upfront: "Why don't you try these couple of things while we take your log files and stuff and go research them?" A little bit of that might be more helpful."
"What could be improved in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the licensing model. It should be more flexible in terms of the users. Currently, it's based on the number of users, but many users only log in once in four months or once in five months. It would be great if the licensing model could be modified based on user needs. We even have users who have not logged in even once."
"If you are an administrator or architect, then the solution is kind of complicated, as it is mostly focused on the end user. So, they need to also focus on the people who are implementing it."
"There is a learning curve when it comes to planning out the deployment strategy, but once it is defined, it runs itself."
"There is no software as a service or PaaS (Platform as a Service) offering from Ilex. The only option is on-premises integration."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Ilex Sign&go is ranked 24th in Single Sign-On (SSO). CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Ilex Sign&go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ilex Sign&go writes "Strong single sign on security comes packaged with simplicity in this on-premises-only solution". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Ilex Sign&go is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID and Auth0.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.