We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,"
"Provides improved security around having your credentials locked down and rotated regularly."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is privileged threat analytics."
"Automates password management to remove the human chain weakness."
"The established sessions on the target systems are fully isolated and the privileged account credentials are never exposed to the end-users or their client applications and devices."
"The integrations are the most valuable aspect of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. The software offers pre-built integrations, and our team can also create custom connectors. This flexibility allows us to integrate with systems that we previously didn't consider integrating with, making it a significant advantage for us."
"This solution is quite stable."
"It has a centralized page where you can manage everything. This makes work easier. You don't have to remember different module URLs or browser applications. It is very easy to get all the secure identities of other environments into a single page, which is very important for us as it helps a lot in terms of operations, e.g., reduces management time. This is a single page where you can manage all accounts and onboard them to the CyberArk. You can then secure and see passwords from everywhere. So, there is a single pane of glass where you can manage all the identities across environments as well as across different types of identities."
"Possibility to login using the fingerprint sensor on Android/iPhone."
"Stronger passwords are being used across the board in our organization."
"I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO."
"It keeps my passwords organized and safe."
"Can create folders for specific types of information (i.e., work, personal, and school)."
"A useful solution for storing encryption keys, programming and developing a SaaS platform."
"The ability to autofill the login credentials has saved me a lot of time in my day to day computing."
"The possibility of assigning information to different groups and individuals has been the most valuable."
"We don't often contact technical support, but when we do it, the response could be faster and better."
"The solution could improve by adding more connectors."
"If there is an area that has room for improvement, it's probably working with their support and getting people on the phone. That is hard to do with most products in general, but that seems to be the difficult area. The product is fantastic, but sometimes we want somebody on the phone."
"Over the past seven years, I have seen a lot of ups and downs with the product."
"Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."
"it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs."
"I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution."
"The product documentation has to be more precise in certain aspects with explanations for functionality limitations along with reference material or screenshots."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"The technical support has no experience."
"The technical support for this solution could be faster support and improved if they had a better understanding of my questions."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"They could possibly add a pre-designed contact feature that would work similar to a cell phone contact feature."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, LastPass, Delinea Secret Server and AWS Secrets Manager.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
