CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs FireEye

CyberArk Privileged Account Security is ranked 2nd in Advanced Threat Protection with 32 reviews vs FireEye which is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Account Security writes "It is modular, and each module can extend its operational area with plug-ins". The top reviewer of FireEye writes "It added a layer of inspection that might be missed by traditional IPS or antivirus products. Features such as IPS are lacking". CyberArk Privileged Account Security is most compared with BeyondTrust PowerBroker, Centrify Infrastructure Services and BalaBit Shell Control Box. FireEye is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls and Cisco ASA.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Advanced threat protection report from it central station 2018 01 20 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, CyberArk, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection.
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs FireEye

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
CyberArk has helped us to identify, store, protect, and monitor the usage of privileged accounts.The Vault offers great capabilities for structuring and accessing data.Central Password Manager is useful for agentless automated password management through AD integration as well as endpoints for different devices.Allows secure, logged access to highly sensitive servers and services.The regulation of accounts is by far the most needed and valuable part of the application.Helped us meet our standards and requirements to help us comply with industry standards and banking regulations.Securely protects our TAP/NUID and privileged access accounts within the company.Rather than multiple tools for maintaining regulatory compliance around passwords and privileged accounts, we have centralized as much as possible with CyberArk. This is now a one stop shop for end users to access their elevated credentials.

Read more »

Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security.The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive.

Read more »

Cons
Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support.The product documentation has to be more precise in certain aspects with explanations for functionality limitations along with reference material or screenshots.New functionalities and discovered bugs take longer to patch. We would greatly appreciate quicker development of security patches and bug corrections.​It's hard to find competent resellers/support.Initial setup is complex. Lots of architecture, lots of planning, and lots of education and training are needed.it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs.It is easily customized, and that customization makes it very easy to start trying to shoehorn the solution into roles it was never intended to fill.Areas the product could be improved are in some of the reporting capabilities and how the reports are configured.

Read more »

There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management.It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives.Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization.Management of the appliance could be greatly improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Cost efficiency is the number one thing that can be improved in my mind. This would change lots of companies minds on purchasing the product.It can be an expensive product.It is not a cheap solution. It is expensive as compared with other solutions. However, it is one of the best solutions in their domain.Pricing and licensing depend on the environment.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Advanced threat protection report from it central station 2018 01 20 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, CyberArk, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection.
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
28,497
Comparisons
16,623
Reviews
31
Followers
1,744
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
21,763
Comparisons
13,240
Reviews
2
Followers
283
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more CyberArk Privileged Account Security competitors »
Cisco
Compared 8% of the time.
See more FireEye competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Website/Video
Website/VideoCyberArk
  • Vendor 7132 screenshot 1515259305
FireEye
  • Vendor 28887 screenshot 1514066355
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

FireEye protects your most valuable assets from those who have them in their sights. Our combination of technology, intelligence, and expertise — reinforced with the most aggressive incident response team — helps eliminate the impact of security breaches. With FireEye, you’ll detect attacks as they happen, understand the risk these attacks pose, and have the resources to quickly resolve security incidents.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersRockwell AutomationFFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Insurance Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Renewables & Environment Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
29%
Insurance Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
44%
University
22%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
31%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
59%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
44%
Midsize Enterprise
25%
Large Enterprise
31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
34%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
47%
Advanced threat protection report from it central station 2018 01 20 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, CyberArk, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection.
Download now
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email