CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs Quest One Identity Manager

CyberArk Privileged Account Security is ranked 1st in Identity and Access Management (IAM) with 32 reviews vs Quest One Identity Manager which is ranked 8th in Identity and Access Management (IAM) with 5 reviews. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Account Security writes "It is modular, and each module can extend its operational area with plug-ins". The top reviewer of Quest One Identity Manager writes "The GUI is clean. JobQueueInfo tracks all processes. WebDesigner allows customizations to be added to the web project". CyberArk Privileged Account Security is most compared with BeyondTrust PowerBroker, Cisco Identity Services Engine and Oracle Identity Manager (Oracle IAM). Quest One Identity Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Oracle Identity Manager (Oracle IAM). See our CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs Quest One Identity Manager report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Cyberark privileged account security vs. quest one identity manager report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs Quest One Identity Manager and others in Identity and Access Management (IAM).
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs Quest One Identity Manager

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.CyberArk has helped us to identify, store, protect, and monitor the usage of privileged accounts.The Vault offers great capabilities for structuring and accessing data.Central Password Manager is useful for agentless automated password management through AD integration as well as endpoints for different devices.Allows secure, logged access to highly sensitive servers and services.The regulation of accounts is by far the most needed and valuable part of the application.Helped us meet our standards and requirements to help us comply with industry standards and banking regulations.Securely protects our TAP/NUID and privileged access accounts within the company.

Read more »

The Data Importer is a great tool to create an ETL. It generates code which is easy to maintain later without the tool.

Read more »

Cons
Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support.The product documentation has to be more precise in certain aspects with explanations for functionality limitations along with reference material or screenshots.New functionalities and discovered bugs take longer to patch. We would greatly appreciate quicker development of security patches and bug corrections.​It's hard to find competent resellers/support.Initial setup is complex. Lots of architecture, lots of planning, and lots of education and training are needed.it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs.It is easily customized, and that customization makes it very easy to start trying to shoehorn the solution into roles it was never intended to fill.

Read more »

Some internal structures are in place because of already depreciated functions back from the time when the solution was used for software deployment and as a help desk.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Cost efficiency is the number one thing that can be improved in my mind. This would change lots of companies minds on purchasing the product.It can be an expensive product.It is not a cheap solution. It is expensive as compared with other solutions. However, it is one of the best solutions in their domain.Pricing and licensing depend on the environment.

Read more »

Start with an operations team that is motivated to learn a lot in a short period of time. The longer you wait, the more expensive it will be to get the right level of expertise in this area.

Read more »

Cyberark privileged account security vs. quest one identity manager report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs Quest One Identity Manager and others in Identity and Access Management (IAM).
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
28,843
Comparisons
16,662
Reviews
31
Followers
1,799
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
7,843
Comparisons
4,934
Reviews
5
Followers
836
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more CyberArk Privileged Account Security competitors »See more Quest One Identity Manager competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerDell One Identity Manager
Website/Video
Website/VideoCyberArk
  • Vendor 7132 screenshot 1526145151
Quest Software
  • Vendor 30185 screenshot 1521914379
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Quest One Identity Manager helps you simplify the access management process by leveraging an automated architecture. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise. It puts you in control of identity management and takes the burden off your IT staff.
OFFER
Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Account Security
Learn more about Quest One Identity Manager
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersRockwell AutomationRadboud University, AIA Associ_s, Williams Energy
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
33%
Insurance Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Renewables & Environment Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
30%
Insurance Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
21%
Healthcare Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Non Tech Company
7%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
59%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
43%
Large Enterprise
57%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
66%
Cyberark privileged account security vs. quest one identity manager report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Account Security vs Quest One Identity Manager and others in Identity and Access Management (IAM).
Download now
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management (IAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email