Compare Cyberbit SOC 3D vs. McAfee MVISION ePO

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Critical Start, McAfee and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: October 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,088
Comparisons
746
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
189
Comparisons
156
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
924
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
McAfee MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator, MVISION ePO, MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator
Learn
Cyberbit
Video Not Available
McAfee
Overview

The SOC 3D Management Platform solution closes the widening gap between today’s sophisticated, continuous cyber threats and the limited mitigation capabilities of current monitoring and security systems.
SOC 3D Management Platform augments your SIEM and security apparatus to shorten cyber event handling times by improving the efficiency of the response process. It enables a more accurate and informed process to mitigate and respond to cyber threats.

Cloud-based Security Management
Remove the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so you can focus on monitoring your endpoints and mobile devices.

Enforce Security from a Single View
Easy-to-follow panels and dashboards assess your security posture. Stay current with summaries of the latest threat information and advisories.

Streamline Operations, Minimize Risk
Automated and straightforward workflows drive security operational efficiencies. Optional workflow approval requires policy or tasks to be reviewed, assuring higher-quality results.

Offer
Learn more about Cyberbit SOC 3D
Learn more about McAfee MVISION ePO
Sample Customers
Bank Leumi
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company56%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company5%
Real Estate/Law Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Critical Start, McAfee and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: October 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cyberbit SOC 3D is ranked 13th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while McAfee MVISION ePO is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Cyberbit SOC 3D is rated 0.0, while McAfee MVISION ePO is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MVISION ePO writes "Easy to set up and lets you centrally manage devices and endpoints from a single console". Cyberbit SOC 3D is most compared with Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR, IBM Resilient, Splunk Phantom, DFLabs IncMan Incident Response and SECDO Platform , whereas McAfee MVISION ePO is most compared with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Splunk Phantom.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.