We performed a comparison between Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR).Earn 20 points
Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while ThreatQ is ranked 25th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews. Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] is rated 0.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and CrowdStrike Falcon.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.