Compare Cyberbit SOC 3D vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cyberbit SOC 3D Logo
1,078 views|737 comparisons
ThreatQ Logo
1,263 views|994 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, McAfee and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,078
Comparisons
737
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
1,263
Comparisons
994
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
Cyberbit
Video Not Available
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

The SOC 3D Management Platform solution closes the widening gap between today’s sophisticated, continuous cyber threats and the limited mitigation capabilities of current monitoring and security systems.
SOC 3D Management Platform augments your SIEM and security apparatus to shorten cyber event handling times by improving the efficiency of the response process. It enables a more accurate and informed process to mitigate and respond to cyber threats.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about Cyberbit SOC 3D
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
Bank LeumiRadar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider19%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, McAfee and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cyberbit SOC 3D is ranked 14th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while ThreatQ is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Cyberbit SOC 3D is rated 0.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Cyberbit SOC 3D is most compared with Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR, IBM Resilient, Splunk Phantom, DFLabs IncMan Incident Response and SECDO Platform, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, IntSights, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform and ThreatStream.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.