Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response.
To learn more, read our detailed Security Incident Response Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have 20,000 endpoints in our organization. It's very critical to monitor each and every device with any of our solutions. By deploying Cybereason, it collects all the information from every computer and it will feed it to the AI engine and do a malware check. It's very clear cut and we save a lot of time. It detects the problem very quickly and we can prevent an issue before it occurs."

More Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] Pros →

"Its agility and scalability are valuable.""It is a scalable solution. I would rate scalability a ten out of ten.""It was useful as a ticketing tool.""Palo Alto is easy to use.""The strengths of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR stem from the fact that it provides functionalities related to patching and URL blocking...It is a scalable solution.""The solution is easy to deploy.""The solution is very reliable.""They have a portal where you can find any kind of integration that you need."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros →

Cons
"It's all on the analysis part. They currently support from email only. If we have a problem with Cybereason like high memory utilization, for example, we send an email to their team and they respond when they see it, but there is no on-call support. They don't offer the ability to call them."

More Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] Cons →

"Its dashboard features need improvement.""It doesn't offer automatic internet reports out of the box.""The solution's technical support could be better.""It's only one cloud right now. It might be helpful for some companies to have an on-premies option.""Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR lacks to offer SIEM functionalities currently.""I think they should increase their collaboration base.""The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone.""The solution requires DV but does not support open-source DV elastic searches."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions."
  • "From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
  • "There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."
  • "It is approx $10,000 or $20,000 per year for two user licenses."
  • "When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."
  • "The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is expensive."
  • "The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is comparable to other solutions in the market."
  • "The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its capability to automate responses and collect information for any security event before you even delve into the details It's a vast product with an active roadmap, so… more »
    Top Answer:It's expensive, but the value it offers makes it worthwhile.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in support. The response time could be faster.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Security Incident Response
    Views
    11,307
    Comparisons
    6,223
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    Palo Alto Networks delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a piece of Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response software that redefines what it means for a program to orchestrate security in an automated manner. It is a next-generation solution that offers all of the features of dozens of siloed security operations center tools in one place. Cortex XSOAR combines case management, automation, real-time collaboration, and threat intelligence management to create a platform that can handle all aspects of system security. Teams that make use of Cortex XSOAR can expect to cut the number of issues that they will have to deal with by 75%. At the same time, the speed at which they resolve those issues that slip through will rise by 90%.

    Cortex XSOAR ensures that all of the IT and security tools that you employ function as a unified system. It does this by employing hundreds of integrations that allow you to run a wide variety of programs at once without ever worrying about them interfering with each other. These integrations are limited only by your imagination. They can be used immediately as they are, if that is what you need. However, they can also be customized according to the requirements of your system. This approach provides you with the maximum levels of both flexibility and utility.

    The model that this platform uses is based on a machine learning algorithm. The level of automation allows you to provide more than an unchanging and inflexible blanket of coverage. Cortex XSOAR takes all of the data that it gathers and uses it to expand its protective capabilities. This creates recommendations that you can use to create a threat playbook that can be deployed uniformly throughout your organization.


    Benefits of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

    Some of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s benefits include:

    • The ability to have all of your data collected in a single location. Valuable time can be saved now that everything that security analysts need to know in order to diagnose and react to threats has been centralized.
    • Security operations center tasks can be automated. This allows you to assign management and analyst staff to the most essential tasks. The effectiveness of your organization will be increased, which will result in a rise in your company’s overall security and productivity.
    • Many kinds of data can be stitched together by this platform. Network, endpoint, cloud, and identity data can be combined to offer a more complete picture of the threats that are discovered.
    • Integrated threat intelligence management can notify you about threats in real time. Now you can diagnose and address issues as they arise. You can also assign values to the threats so that your resources are being used in the most effective manner possible.


    Reviews from Real Users

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s centralized monitoring interface and automation are two features that help it stand out. This might help explain why one quarter of the Fortune 500 companies choose Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR over the competition.

    Peerspot users note the effectiveness of these features. One user wrote, “We were looking for a single pane of glass type of solution that would allow us to physically be in one appliance - be able to work in concert with other servers that we have within our environment. We wanted orchestration and automation. The single pane of glass was the most important part.” Another noted, "The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Educational Organization15%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Incident Response
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews. Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] writes "Detects a problem very quickly and enables us to prevent an issue before it occurs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Swimlane.

    We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.