We performed a comparison between Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."We have 20,000 endpoints in our organization. It's very critical to monitor each and every device with any of our solutions. By deploying Cybereason, it collects all the information from every computer and it will feed it to the AI engine and do a malware check. It's very clear cut and we save a lot of time. It detects the problem very quickly and we can prevent an issue before it occurs."
"Its agility and scalability are valuable."
"It is a scalable solution. I would rate scalability a ten out of ten."
"It was useful as a ticketing tool."
"Palo Alto is easy to use."
"The strengths of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR stem from the fact that it provides functionalities related to patching and URL blocking...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"The solution is very reliable."
"They have a portal where you can find any kind of integration that you need."
"It's all on the analysis part. They currently support from email only. If we have a problem with Cybereason like high memory utilization, for example, we send an email to their team and they respond when they see it, but there is no on-call support. They don't offer the ability to call them."
"Its dashboard features need improvement."
"It doesn't offer automatic internet reports out of the box."
"The solution's technical support could be better."
"It's only one cloud right now. It might be helpful for some companies to have an on-premies option."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR lacks to offer SIEM functionalities currently."
"I think they should increase their collaboration base."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"The solution requires DV but does not support open-source DV elastic searches."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews. Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] writes "Detects a problem very quickly and enables us to prevent an issue before it occurs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Swimlane.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.