Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] vs ServiceNow Security Operations comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] and ServiceNow Security Operations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response.
To learn more, read our detailed Security Incident Response Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have 20,000 endpoints in our organization. It's very critical to monitor each and every device with any of our solutions. By deploying Cybereason, it collects all the information from every computer and it will feed it to the AI engine and do a malware check. It's very clear cut and we save a lot of time. It detects the problem very quickly and we can prevent an issue before it occurs."

More Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] Pros →

"​Integration to other security tools allows for a consolidated view of all vulnerabilities, incidents, etc. for all sorts of leverage in a single platform to assess governance risk and compliance as well as an enhanced, enriched intelligence.​""The product has a very simple UI.""It gives you the ability to bring data into the system. The workflows are out of the box, and it gives you the ability to auto-assign the incidents based on criteria and vulnerabilities.""Reduces time to closure and closure metrics for vulnerabilities.""We refer to the setup and installation guide provided by ServiceNow. They have good documentation, which makes it easier to handle the process.""My favorite feature is the application vulnerability scanner.""ServiceNow Security Operations also takes care of GRC, governance, risk and compliance, enabling it to provide risk assessment.""The ease of use is great."

More ServiceNow Security Operations Pros →

Cons
"It's all on the analysis part. They currently support from email only. If we have a problem with Cybereason like high memory utilization, for example, we send an email to their team and they respond when they see it, but there is no on-call support. They don't offer the ability to call them."

More Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] Cons →

"An area for improvement I observed in ServiceNow Security Operations is the need to maintain correct CMDB data because if you're unable to do this, you can't perfectly maintain the vulnerability data. CMDB data in ServiceNow Security Operations needs to be accurate. As I've been working on ServiceNow Security Operations for only seven months, I still need more time to try all its modules before I can give recommendations regarding additional features I'd like to see in the solution.""The solution needs to make customization easier. You cannot do much customization immediately. It requires an extensive workload. If the customization process was user-friendly, it would be much better.""It's very slow. When you click a button or update a field, it takes forever to actually react.""They should stick to the roadmap and continue to build plugins and integrations with other third parties, enhance the UI, and enhance the reporting. It's all good. They should just continue enhancing the releases.""The product is called SecOps, but it is not security operations in terms of SIEM solutions.""It doesn't interact with things very well.""There is room for improvement in terms of developer support and documentation.""We'd like customization to be easier in terms of the UI and using the dashboards."

More ServiceNow Security Operations Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This product is a good value for the money."
  • "If you're going to implement it on your own, there would be internal costs. If you're going to implement it through a contractor or consultant, you have to pay for that."
  • "The solution is more expensive than BMC Remedy, the other ITSM tool available in the market."
  • More ServiceNow Security Operations Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect of working with ServiceNow is its meaningful and feature-rich product.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of developer support and documentation. While they offer some assistance, a more detailed and accurate set of guidelines would be beneficial for implementing… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Security Incident Response
    Views
    624
    Comparisons
    331
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    555
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    ServiceNow
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    ServiceNow Security Operations is a cutting-edge security solution designed to elevate organizations' security incident response (SIR) processes through automation and orchestration. Going beyond traditional SOAR, this comprehensive Security Operations Suite integrates seamlessly with other ServiceNow products and offers a wide array of features. Its components include Security Incident Response (SIR), which automates incident workflows and offers pre-built playbooks; Security Configuration Compliance (SCC), continuously scanning and automating compliance tasks; Vulnerability Response (VR), prioritizing and remediating vulnerabilities; Threat Intelligence (TI), aggregating threat data for proactive threat hunting; and additional features like IT Service Management integration, Machine Learning and AI, reporting, and a mobile app. The benefits span improved incident response speed, reduced mean time to resolution, increased security posture, enhanced compliance, collaborative synergy between security and IT teams, and operational cost reductions. 

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    DXC Technology, Freedom Security Alliance, Prime Therapeutics, Seton Hall University, York Risk Services
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company44%
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Analyst Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Incident Response
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while ServiceNow Security Operations is ranked 3rd in Security Incident Response with 14 reviews. Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow Security Operations is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] writes "Detects a problem very quickly and enables us to prevent an issue before it occurs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Security Operations writes "Mature with nice UI and customizable workflows". Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow Security Operations is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Resilient and Fortinet FortiSOAR.

    See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.

    We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.