We performed a comparison between Cybereason Managed Detection & Response and Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Arctic Wolf Networks, Huntress and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)."The best part about Binary Defense MDR is that it runs on everything, and they keep an eye on things 24/7."
"Binary Defense's most valuable feature is the 24/7 monitoring and threat hunting. Their team checks the latest breaches and how they're done."
"The most valuable features are the SIEM and the ticketing function; the latter is very smooth and easy to read and understand. We don't have any issues looking at the ticketing information when we're trying to identify what's going on."
"The speed at which their services are reactive is valuable. Nowadays, when a threat hits an endpoint, you've got minutes, not hours or days. Their average response time is about four minutes on an alert. For anything that needs to be sent to us, it's about fourteen minutes, which is pretty good. They're the third SOC that I've used in fifteen years. By far, they are the quickest ones to act. When you're looking at prevention, that's a key factor."
"Binary Defense has a human service department that provides live monitoring for our systems."
"One of the main benefits of Binary Defense MDR is the ability to easily meet with their support team to discuss any issues we encounter."
"The most valuable part of Binary Defense is its team of cybersecurity analysts. Their analysts filter out the noise and only forward the critical threats that require a response instead of false positives."
"With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is endpoint management...The solution's support team is quite good at giving us feedback if there is an issue."
"The deployment's so much easier than other options."
More Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] Pros →
"It's sometimes difficult to know when to engage Binary Defense or TrustedSec, their sister company. TrustedSec is more focused on offensive security, as opposed to the defensive security that the MDR solution provides. It would be awesome if there were a better bridge between that relationship for when we need to get more proactive services or when we need to do a penetration test."
"The only area I see for improvement with Binary Defense is their service portal. It could benefit from some enhancements."
"I don't find any downside to them, but if I have to put one, it would be consistent manpower or staffing. The only area where the solution can be improved is going to be with people. As they grow, they are struggling with the same thing that every other company is, which is getting talent and getting that talent to stay, but they've just revised their tiering system to go from a flat analyst and manager to a three-tier solution where it goes through two or three before it gets elevated. That seems to have worked out well, so if one level misses it, the next one picks it up, and it works out fine."
"I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking."
"We found a couple of bugs in the user interface."
"It's hard to think of anything that they need to improve on, but just to point out something, I would like to see them provide advanced XDR."
"Binary Defense MDR could be even better with additional features, like automatic scans and file quarantine."
"The most significant area for improvement is in support for non-English speakers; we're a global organization, so many of our users are not English speakers, which can make interacting with them a challenge. There's no Chinese language support, so we must rely on what we can do with the internet. We don't expect Binary Defense to build a language staff, but details can get lost in translation when we assume the whole world speaks English."
"For every new client or every new case, my company has to spin up a new instance, because of which there is a new URL."
"Typically the competition will undercut them and they'll lose on price as they are quite expensive."
More Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] Cons →
More Cybereason Managed Detection & Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cybereason Managed Detection & Response is ranked 23rd in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 1 review while Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Cybereason Managed Detection & Response is rated 8.0, while Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Cybereason Managed Detection & Response writes " A scalable tool with an easy initial setup phase useful to deal with incident response". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] writes "Great detection and response with very good compliance reporting". Cybereason Managed Detection & Response is most compared with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, whereas Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.
We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.