Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs CyberGRX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and CyberGRX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pros →

"The interface is simple to use."

More CyberGRX Pros →

Cons
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Cons →

"There are not many partners for this product in India, which makes the OEM very difficult to reach."

More CyberGRX Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."
  • More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Compared to similar products by other vendors, this is an expensive one."
  • More CyberGRX Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature.
    Top Answer:I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based. If you have 10 computers versus a million computers, obviously the pricing will change.
    Top Answer:An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    669
    Comparisons
    463
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    8.0
    60th
    out of 84 in GRC
    Views
    41
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

    Prioritization is no longer a dark art—it's data science. Advanced algorithms, combined with rich internal and external intel, offer recommended fixes that will lower risk in as few moves as possible.

    Track vulnerability fluctuations and forecast weaponization with up to 94% accuracy, giving you the chance to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities before bad actors can mount an attack.

    With more than 19 threat intelligence feeds at your fingertips, you gain a comprehensive view of emerging threats, shifting trends, and your own risk profile.

    A single source of data-verified truth aligns security and IT, eliminating friction and freeing up resources. And intuitive, simplified risk scores help you generate reports anyone can understand.

    Built by and with security practitioners, CyberGRX provides the most comprehensive third-party cyber risk management platform, addressing the existing inefficiencies and creating benefit for both enterprises and for their partners and vendors. Through its innovative design, automation and advanced analytics, the CyberGRX platform enables enterprises to cost-effectively and collaboratively identify, assess, mitigate and monitor an enterprise’s cyber risk exposure across its entire vendor, partner and customer ecosystem.

    Sample Customers
    TransUnion
    Aetna, ADP, Blackstone
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Insurance Company8%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government9%
    Construction Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while CyberGRX is ranked 60th in GRC. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while CyberGRX is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberGRX writes "Scales well and technical support is good, but it is expensive". Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Skybox Security Suite, whereas CyberGRX is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, UpGuard Vendor Risk and SecurityScorecard.

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.