CyCognito vs Verodin comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyCognito Logo
330 views|225 comparisons
Trellix Logo
1,066 views|524 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyCognito and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
330
Comparisons
225
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,066
Comparisons
524
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Picus Security logo
Compared 26% of the time.
AttackIQ logo
Compared 24% of the time.
Cymulate logo
Compared 19% of the time.
Pentera logo
Compared 16% of the time.
SafeBreach logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Learn More
CyCognito
Video Not Available
Overview

Legacy security testing approaches may help security teams find and remediate risks on-premises and directly managed infrastructure. But, they are no match for the rapidly expanding attack surface caused by modern, highly distributed IT ecosystems.

CyCognito was founded by veterans of national intelligence agencies who understand how attackers exploit blind spots, and who recognized the need for a radical new approach to threat assessment. Our mission is to build the next-generation security risk assessment product category: solutions that autonomously discover, enumerate, and prioritize each organization’s security risks based upon a global analysis of all external attack surfaces and attack vectors that a real attacker would likely exploit.

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Sample Customers
UTA, BERTELSMANN, WIPRO
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Legal Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CyCognito is ranked 11th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). CyCognito is rated 0.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". CyCognito is most compared with Censys Attack Surface Management, Cortex Xpanse, IBM Security Randori Recon, Cymulate and Pentera, whereas Verodin is most compared with Picus Security, AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera and SafeBreach.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.