We compared CylancePROTECT and SentinelOne Singularity Complete based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Based on user reviews, CylancePROTECT has advantages in terms of easy setup and control. It has a user-friendly interface, employs proactive AI monitoring, and has few false positives. However, it is criticized for its pricing, less user-friendly dashboard, and inadequate support and communication. On the other hand, SentinelOne Singularity Complete stands out in agent deployment, low resource usage, quick threat detection, and an intriguing interface. It also offers good value for the price, although improvements in administrative interface, stability, integration functionality, and reporting are suggested. Customer service and support for SentinelOne are generally positive, while the quality of support for CylancePROTECT is mixed.
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"CylancePROTECT is very stable - we've had no issues with performance and no errors or bugs."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."
"Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"
"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."
"I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats."
"The deployment of updates is easy."
"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."
"The offline protection offered by SentinelOne Singularity Complete for my devices is valuable."
"SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones."
"SentinelOne is very simple to install and very simple to manage. It's very aggressive, so it does protection well, and it seems to be stopping attacks that other solutions cannot."
"The best thing is it has a secure shell command that you can use to get into any endpoint and do some jobs."
"It seamlessly integrates with other solutions, providing a high level of compatibility and effectiveness."
"The most valuable features are threat hunting, the ability to disconnect or disable a machine's network connection in real time, and the ability to restore the connection once the issue is resolved quickly."
"I have been a Mac guy for twenty years, and the feature parity and the capabilities of a Macintosh agent are unparalleled in the industry. It is the first anti-malware and antivirus that does not make you feel that you bought the wrong processor. It is really good and lightweight."
"I really love how simple and effective the product is. I really love the visibility it gives me into the endpoint. I really love that they open their product to the customer to enhance it with custom-made software, giving you the APIs to program it. Those are all things competitors don't have."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"rom my experience interacting with the primary or the central administrative console, it's quite complex. You would need a fair bit of technical experience to set it up, implement and maintain it. That would be one area for improvement."
"I would like to see a better UI in terms of sifting through more specific data and providing analytics. A little bit more would be nice."
"The user interface is outdated."
"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."
"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."
"It is hard to manage."
"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."
"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."
"There is room for improvement with the management interface. It could be more user friendly."
"SentinelOne could improve by creating an autopilot or automated way to roll out the solution more efficiently which would be helpful."
"The stability of SentinelOne should be improved."
"We have had cases where Singularity Complete has caused applications to malfunction."
"SentinelOne is making a lot of moves to acquire various companies, but the roadmap isn't clear, and it is still uncertain how the new acquisitions will integrate. For example, SentinelOne recently acquired a mobile security solution, but there is no real integration between the platforms."
"The solution can improve by adding more granular firewall capabilities."
"It would help if they could get all the relevant threat information, the related events, in one place. Currently, we need to go to a number of places and do research. If they could have it all in one place, that would help investigations."
"Singularity Complete's process stream has room for improvement."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 28th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 37 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 174 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and Intercept X Endpoint. See our CylancePROTECT vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.