We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Elastic Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The stability is very good."
"The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well."
"What's most valuable in CylancePROTECT is the optics feature. I also like its easy-to-use and user-friendly dashboard and monitoring system."
"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"Does malware analysis. Blocks WannaCry and other attacks that have come out."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"The CylancePROTECT agent is very low on CPU usage, so it has virtually no adverse impact on my servers, desktops, or workstations."
"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."
"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."
"The indexes allow you to get your results quickly. The filtering and log passing is the advantage of Logstash."
"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."
"I like the indexing of the logs."
"The most valuable features of Elastic Security are it is open-source and provides a high level of security."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is the best open-source product for people working in SO, managing and analyzing logs."
"I like that it's a SIEM platform. I like that I can sell Elastic Security quickly. Elastic Security has a large community that can support users."
"Elastic Security is a highly flexible platform that can be implemented anywhere."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution is not stable."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."
"It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now."
"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."
"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."
"Reporting is an area with shortcomings in CylancePROTECT that needs to be improved."
"The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information."
"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."
"It is hard to manage."
"There is an area of improvement in the Logs list. The load list may need to be paginated as there are limits."
"Technical support could respond faster."
"If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve."
"In terms of improvement, there could be more automation in responding to and evaluating detections."
"We'd like better premium support."
"I would like more ways to manage permissions and restrict access to certain users."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Elastic Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and IBM Security QRadar. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Elastic Security report.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.