We compared CylancePROTECT and SentinelOne Singularity Complete based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Based on user reviews, CylancePROTECT has advantages in terms of easy setup and control. It has a user-friendly interface, employs proactive AI monitoring, and has few false positives. However, it is criticized for its pricing, less user-friendly dashboard, and inadequate support and communication. On the other hand, SentinelOne Singularity Complete stands out in agent deployment, low resource usage, quick threat detection, and an intriguing interface. It also offers good value for the price, although improvements in administrative interface, stability, integration functionality, and reporting are suggested. Customer service and support for SentinelOne are generally positive, while the quality of support for CylancePROTECT is mixed.
"It is stable and scalable."
"The stability is very good."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."
"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"It secures different entry points into the network."
"The most valuable features of CylancePROTECT are its powerful machine-learning capabilities and predictive intelligence."
"The CylancePROTECT agent is very low on CPU usage, so it has virtually no adverse impact on my servers, desktops, or workstations."
"It's quite scalable."
"It seamlessly integrates with other solutions, providing a high level of compatibility and effectiveness."
"Having the capability to gain insights across our network, observe all our machines, and have a centralized view of what's protected and where things are is incredibly advantageous."
"It gives you good visibility of any threats or vulnerabilities that you might have on your network."
"Tracking down which devices don't currently have SentinelOne on them is the most valuable feature of the product."
"Device control and network control are valuable."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The visibility component is the most valuable feature."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution is not stable."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."
"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."
"rom my experience interacting with the primary or the central administrative console, it's quite complex. You would need a fair bit of technical experience to set it up, implement and maintain it. That would be one area for improvement."
"The initial deployment was quite complicated."
"The user interface is outdated."
"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."
"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."
"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."
"We had some stability issues when we started working with SentinelOne."
"Some of the reports that are exported through SentinelOne can be complicated for people who are not IT professionals. For example, we have some people within our leadership who would like to know why we are spending so much money on their product, and one of the ways that we are able to do that is through reports. Some of those reports are pretty easy to understand, and some of them are very complicated. Because they are not IT or security professionals, they may not have the same grasp. I wish their reporting feature was a little better."
"Generally, the stability is good, but I would like to see better stability from the solution. The stability issue is partially a con of a behavioral-based product, but being behavioral-based, it also has a lot of pros."
"I would like to see a better mobile app so that I could look through my phone at the alerts and not have to go to the website. They should make it a little more mobile-accessible."
"The anti-ransomware technology takes up a lot of disc space."
"There are features that I would like them to add. They have little to do with endpoint protection, but if they could add encryption and DLP on, it would make it even better."
"The endpoint firewall capability is fairly primitive and basic."
"SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 176 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Trend Micro Deep Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our CylancePROTECT vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.