Compare CylancePROTECT vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CylancePROTECT vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating.""The solution is pretty easy to scale.""The solution is stable.""On the management side, we liked the way it displays things.""The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well.""The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features.""Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected.""Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"

More CylancePROTECT Pros »

"I use this solution for data blocking, software protection, and frame protection.""Technical support was perfect.""Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too.""Virtual Batching and the intelligent anti-malware components are valuable security tools.""It can be managed from the cloud.""The most valuable feature is Data Loss Prevention (DLP)."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"I would like to see a better UI in terms of sifting through more specific data and providing analytics. A little bit more would be nice.""The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting.""The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use.""It should provide more details about the events that they have detected.""I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices.""The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information.""I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined.""It should have better support for Windows and Mac."

More CylancePROTECT Cons »

"We found that when we push Trend Micro from the console to our client's PCs, we need to manually restart the PC. I have 500 users and the manual input is time-consuming.""Trend Micro is a little bit complicated when it comes to setting up special policies.""Lacking analytics and a machine learning technique.""The cost is very high and it should be lower to be more competitive.""No built-in vulnerability scanner for management solutions.""I would like to see SMS notifications sent as alerts, in case we do not have access to our email."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user.""I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is.""The monthly fee is $55 USD per user.""The product cost is about $5, per user, per month."

More CylancePROTECT Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing is based on the components you choose from the suite to run in your installation. Costs vary by the number of features and the number of servers.""Pricewise, this product is okay."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Top Answer: I that feel there are two old problems still there in the market: 1-Vendors don't talk to each other. 2-Whoever is… more »
Top Answer: Has good RAM capacity for the power I need
Top Answer: We paid according to the number of endpoints that we have and it was approximately the same that we were paying for… more »
Top Answer: It can be managed from the cloud.
Top Answer: I am not sure that I can give any exact advice as to the pricing because it will be different for each customer and for… more »
Top Answer: I don't think there are really any large areas of concern for me right now although it would be helpful if the endpoint… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, ServerProtect, ServerProtect for Storage
Learn
Cisco
Cylance
Trend Micro
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Cylance® is revolutionizing cybersecurity with products and services that proactively prevent, rather than reactively detect the execution of advanced persistent threats and malware. Our technology is deployed on over four million endpoints and protects hundreds of enterprise clients worldwide including Fortune 100 organizations and government institutions.

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, powered by XGen security, leverages a blend of cross-generational threat protection techniques to safeguard a wide range of network attached storage systems by detecting and removing viruses and spyware in real time. This comprehensive storage security uses the industry-standard ICAP protocol to complement support for traditional RPC communication protocols. To simplify network protection for EMC, NetApp, and Hitachi Data Systems storage systems, ServerProtect for Storage provides automatic, incremental security updates and centralized management of servers via a web-based console.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about CylancePROTECT
Learn more about Trend Micro ServerProtect
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankPanasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, KiewitSiemens
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government6%
Construction Company4%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company43%
Financial Services Firm14%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
Construction Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government6%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
K 12 Educational Company Or School9%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Comms Service Provider7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Large Enterprise33%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CylancePROTECT vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CylancePROTECT is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 10 reviews while Trend Micro ServerProtect is ranked 25th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 6 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.4, while Trend Micro ServerProtect is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Proactive AI-based security that scales as we need it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro ServerProtect writes "Realtime intelligent end-to-end detection and protection from malware in a highly versatile product". CylancePROTECT is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, SentinelOne, Microsoft Windows Defender and ESET Endpoint Security, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.