Cymulate vs Group-IB Digital Risk Protection comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cymulate Logo
199 views|148 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Group-IB Logo
351 views|219 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting capabilities are very good.""The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."

More Cymulate Pros →

"It provides the broadest protection covering websites, marketplace, advertising, and social media, which includes Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. They also offer mobile application monitoring and enforcement not only in the Google Play store but also in the Apple store. They can monitor and enforce the distribution of mobile applications, any kind of app website such as Android apk.com, and a lot of other custom stuff. To be able to customize and specify the platforms that need to be monitored and enforced is something that our clients find most valuable."

More Group-IB Digital Risk Protection Pros →

Cons
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup.""The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."

More Cymulate Cons →

"It is in the early stage of innovation, but it has been developing constantly in a major fashion. The room for improvements for this kind of solution is basically in terms of mapping between multiple resources. For example, if a fraudster or scammer is using Instagram to track potential customers of an organization, he might also use fraudulent resources of a website, mobile application, or instant messenger as a part of an elaborate scheme. Group-IB is working on mapping such related fraud resources so that they can see the whole pattern and then track the fraudster or scammer conducting the scheme. They could also improve the Risk Scoring Engine. Whenever any resource comes up in the monitoring section, there is an engine to score whether it is a high risk, low risk, or no risk, or whether it is legal for the customer. This part could be improved because different channels require different mechanisms for scoring the risk. On the website, it can score a risk easily, but for social media and instant messenger, some things need to be adjusted. It is not similar to monitoring a website."

More Group-IB Digital Risk Protection Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is affordable."
  • "Cymulate's services are expensive."
  • More Cymulate Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "At the moment, its pricing is very reasonable for the whole work that Group-IB is doing for the banks. We can easily calculate the return on investment based on that pricing because the number of resources that need to be taken down would reach up to thousands within months. Its pricing is very reasonable for this kind of work. There is no hidden fee. It is subscription-based. There are different packages that are based on a limited or unlimited number of takedowns. It is very simple with no hidden fees."
  • More Group-IB Digital Risk Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Risk Protection solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day.
    Top Answer:Cymulate's services are expensive for CE EU region . In some cases, it may be more cost-effective to hire a local competitor or ethical hacker for a year to perform frequent testing rather than… more »
    Top Answer:The management at Cymulate is inconsistent and unreliable, particularly in the sales process. Changes happen abruptly, with sudden shifts in personnel and strategy. The turnover rate for key… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    199
    Comparisons
    148
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    765
    Rating
    9.0
    9th
    Views
    351
    Comparisons
    219
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Group-IB
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    For companies that want to manage their security posture against the evolving threat landscape: Cymulate SaaS-based Extended Security Posture Management (XSPM) deploys within an hour, enabling security professionals to continuously challenge, validate and optimize their cyber-security posture end-to-end across the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

    The platform provides out-of-the-box, expert and threat intelligence-led risk assessments that are simple to deploy and use for all maturity levels, and constantly updated. It also provides an open framework to create and automate red and purple teaming by generating penetration scenarious and advanced attack campaigns tailored to their unique environments and security politices. Cymulate allowes professionals to manage, know and control their dynamic environment. 

    Artificial intelligence that manages your risk exposure The Digital Risk Protection platform uses advanced technologies to detect any illegitimate use of your logos, trademarks, content, and design layouts across the digital surface.

    Sample Customers
    Euronext, YMCA, Telit, Nemours 
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Media Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise56%

    Cymulate is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while Group-IB Digital Risk Protection is ranked 9th in Digital Risk Protection. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while Group-IB Digital Risk Protection is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Group-IB Digital Risk Protection writes "Broad protection, good stability, fast support, and reasonable pricing". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas Group-IB Digital Risk Protection is most compared with Recorded Future, ZeroFOX and CloudSEK XVigil.

    See our list of best Digital Risk Protection vendors.

    We monitor all Digital Risk Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.