We performed a comparison between Cymulate and RiskIQ Illuminate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Mandiant, Palo Alto Networks, Trend Micro and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM)."The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The solution is stable with 12 years of established historical data."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful."
Earn 20 points
Cymulate is ranked 7th in Attack Surface Management (ASM) with 2 reviews while RiskIQ Illuminate is ranked 13th in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Cymulate is rated 9.0, while RiskIQ Illuminate is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RiskIQ Illuminate writes "Able to discover unpatched servers, offers good stability, and scales very well". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas RiskIQ Illuminate is most compared with Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, ZeroFOX and Recorded Future.
See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.
We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
