Compare Cymulate vs. SafeBreach

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cymulate Logo
2,678 views|2,066 comparisons
SafeBreach Logo
1,985 views|1,223 comparisons
Answers from the Community
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi @Andrei Bigdan ​and @NOUBOUM NOUBI BORIS HERMAN. Possibly, you can help here with some insights. Thanks!
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,678
Comparisons
2,066
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,985
Comparisons
1,223
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

For companies that want to assure their security against the evolving threat landscape. Cymulate SaaS-based Continuous Security Validation deploys within an hour, enabling them to challenge, assess and optimize their cyber-security posture simply and continuously end-to-end, across the MITRE ATT&CK® framework.

The platform provides out-of-the-box, expert and threat intelligence led risk assessments that are simple to use for all skill levels, and constantly updated. It also provides an open framework for ethical hackers to create and automate red and purple team exercises and security assurance programs, tailored to their unique environment and security policies. Cymulate, for security professionals that want to know and control their dynamic environment.

SafeBreach is the world's most widely used continuous security validation platform in enterprise companies. The company's patented platform empowers CISOs and their teams to validate security controls, maximize their effectiveness, and drive down risk. 

SafeBreach provides a "hacker's view" of an enterprise's security posture by continuously validating security controls and presenting findings in customized dashboards to enable stakeholders to cleanly focus on the biggest risk to the organization. SafeBreach automatically and safely executes thousands of attack methods to validate network, endpoint, cloud, container, and email security controls against the Hacker's Playbook, the world's largest collection of attack data broken down by methods, tactics, and threat actors. Data from SafeBreach validations can improve SOC team responses and empower management to make smarter decisions to better manage risk and invest resources.

Offer
Learn more about Cymulate
Learn more about SafeBreach
Sample Customers
Euronext, YMCA, Telit, Nemours 
PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm8%
Healthcare Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm11%
Healthcare Company5%

Cymulate is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while SafeBreach is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Cymulate is rated 0.0, while SafeBreach is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, AttackIQ, Verodin, XM Cyber HaXM and CyCognito, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Verodin, AttackIQ, Picus Security, XM Cyber HaXM and FireEye Network Security.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.