We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cynet vs. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Cynet, Cisco and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's transparent, so it's not something where every user has to press a button to download or do the thing. It is centralized, in fact. Personally, I use Malwarebytes and other tools, which are fine for home use. Cynet is also relatively silent in terms of operation, except when it's required to act.""It provides good protection from ransomware and malware attacks. It is very good as compared to other products. If any threat is there, their support is very good. They immediately respond to the users and do a follow-up. They call us and also provide email support.""We are using almost all of the features and we find it quite good overall.""The dashboard is beautiful, overall easy of use, and the UBA and NBA features are valued.""I have found the continued support and pretty much all the features to be valuable. They all stand out as being positive. It continues to detect unusual activity when it's supposed to, and so far we haven't had any issues.""This solution requires less management and is very easy to use.""It can be deployed in autonomous mode, and then it automatically blocks malware threats.""The product is very easy to use. Customers really appreciate that."

More Cynet Pros »

Cons
"The inability to add contact information inside the Cynet is also an issue because it makes things more complicated. I would like to have a simple feature to enter a contact name and number for the person taking care of that unit or that server.""They have some things in the pipeline, we understand, and they're going to be able to support Android and all these other devices soon. The key is the devices - which is an aspect that is lacking right now. Every company has that problem, not just Cynet.""In terms of what could be improved, I would say the usability of this product for new threats. Meaning, not everything which is new is properly seen by the product and not all the required actions are taken.""A support center in Asia is needed.""Could have better integration with other security applications.""Linux servers are not supported.""Its dashboard is not so good. On the dashboard, they don't show the count for client endpoints, which is a failure of this product. This count should be shown on the dashboard. I have 1,000 clients, but I can't see it anywhere on the dashboard.""I would like to see support for mobile protection and some additional reports included."

More Cynet Cons »

"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."

More McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It gives you a high level of protection at a very good price.""The price should not be less than $100 which is quite reasonable for this solution because you are getting multiple components.""Our billing is on a quarterly basis, but they have monthly or annual billing availability.""Its licensing is on a monthly basis.""Pricing wise, Cynet seems to be very competitive. The cost is probably lower than that offered by many of its competitors for all the functions and features it offers.""The pricing was good.""Everything is included in this one solution and the pricing is pretty competitive."

More Cynet Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The support team that stands behind the detection and response.  Is there adequate expertise and are they behind you 24x7x365?  Cynet CyOps has been there for us.
Top Answer: I have found the continued support and pretty much all the features to be valuable. They all stand out as being positive. It continues to detect unusual activity when it's supposed to, and so far we… more »
Top Answer: Pricing wise, Cynet seems to be very competitive. The cost is probably lower than that offered by many of its competitors for all the functions and features it offers. The licensing is very flexible… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
7,650
Comparisons
4,625
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
668
Rating
8.4
Views
1,330
Comparisons
952
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
394
Rating
3.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
Learn More
Overview

Cynet has pioneered the security industry’s first all-in-one security platform purposely built for organizations that need the ability to effortlessly identify, block and respond to all types of attacks inside the perimeter - defending endpoints, network, files and users - without the heavy burden of deep cyber expertise and the overhead of integrating and managing multiple products. Our approach converges and brings synergy with technology: endpoint protection, EDR, vulnerability management, deception, threat intelligence and network and end-user analytics, and expertise: a 24/7 cyber SWAT team for incident response, malware analysis, threat hunting and forensics. Cynet deploys in hours and simplifies management with automated monitoring to complement any sized staff.   

Endpoint detection and response (EDR) continuously monitor and gather data to provide the visibility and context needed to detect and respond to threats. ... McAfee® MVISION EDR helps to manage the high volume of alerts, empowering analysts of all skill levels to do more and investigate more effectively.

Offer
Learn more about Cynet
Learn more about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
Sample Customers
Meuhedet, East Boston Neighborhood Health Center
Sutherland Global Services
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company30%
Cloud Provider20%
Construction Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider25%
Computer Software Company24%
Government5%
Construction Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise36%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise56%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Cynet, Cisco and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cynet is ranked 2nd in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 12 reviews while McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is ranked 24th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 1 review. Cynet is rated 8.6, while McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of Cynet writes "A complete, transparent, and centralized solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response writes "Resource-heavy, slow processing time, and bad technical support". Cynet is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, McAfee Active Response and Trend Micro XDR.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.