Daegis eDiscovery [EOL] vs IBM PSS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
views| comparisons
IBM Logo
89 views|68 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Daegis eDiscovery [EOL] and IBM PSS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
24th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
89
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PSS
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available
IBM Atlas eDiscovery Process Management empowers attorneys, paralegals and discovery directors to manage rigorous, highly defensible legal workflows.
Sample Customers
Faegre Baker Daniels
LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Daegis eDiscovery [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while IBM PSS is ranked 24th in eDiscovery. Daegis eDiscovery [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM PSS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Daegis eDiscovery [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM PSS is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.