IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs data.world comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between data.world and IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Alation, SAP and others in Metadata Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Metadata Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "In terms of pricing, I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog excessive. It's at the top end of the price range in terms of what you get for your money. It's an expensive product, and contractually, IBM is difficult to deal with. I can't remember the exact cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but it could be in the region of three hundred thousand pounds."
  • "Licensing for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is per user."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is expensive."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The ability to create special rules inside the solution using Portuguese is the most valuable feature.
    Top Answer:The scalability has room for improvement. I would like the ability to run the solution from different servers. The price has room for improvement.
    Top Answer:IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is used to integrate and govern our information.
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 27 in Metadata Management
    Views
    285
    Comparisons
    222
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    out of 27 in Metadata Management
    Views
    812
    Comparisons
    467
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    668
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Information Governance Catalog
    Learn More
    Overview

    The modern catalog for data and analysis.
    data.world unites and classifies all of your business’s data, metadata, and analysis within an intuitive user experience to help technical and non-technical people collaborate using their preferred tools. Built on a knowledge graph, data.world keeps your most valuable information assets connected to everything people need to find, understand, and use them.

    Information governance is a next-gen comprehensive process of administering, enhancing, and collating information to strengthen an organization’s trust and belief that its decision and business processes are the best for the organization’s overall health and continued progress. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is an intuitive, progressive web-based tool that empowers users to discover, comprehend, and dissect information. Users are able to design, administer, and collaborate to track data pipelines, execute protocols and procedures, and share common business languages.

    Integrate the solution with IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog to increase on-premises Information Governance Catalog efficiency in the cloud and improve the benefit of current gathered data sets. This value-added governance catalog enables users to place gathered metadata where experienced users, analytics, and data communities have seamless protected access to the appropriate resources, based on need, while still maintaining the organization's governance standards.

    IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog delivers a secure starting point for organizations to better comprehend and govern their information across the entire network, and continually delivers secure, well-defined, and governed data.

    IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Benefits

    • Manage catalog metadata: Run data workflows to prove trusted information, support compliance and governance standards, resolve duplicate assets, map databases to database aliases, and automate the authentication of data sources to improve overall project deployment. Additionally, users will discover how data moves across the network and will be able to identify how and where data was sourced and how it is being consumed. This will promote a greater assurance and belief that the data is continually secure and safe.

    • Improved people and process management: The solution helps to definitively clarify roles and responsibilities of all team participants. Users can easily design, edit, and publish governance protocols, accept new or audited information governance rules, and/or move the rule to Draft status. Users will also obtain notice (via email) of any governance issues that appear in their glossary or information assets.

    • Boost current metadata: This can be achieved by using descriptions and relationships, group related labels, stewards, assets, and custom attributes to all other related assets. Develop protracted data sources to add metadata to the catalog that may not be able to be added automatically or that are not able to be imported easily from outside third-party applications. The solution will also help users have a greater understanding of all their data assets - unstructured, semi-structured, and structured.

    • Discover assets in the catalog: Users can easily initiate either a simple or advanced search or even begin very intensive deep queries. An intuitive GUI is available to trace the history of all changes, probe stewards, information assets, glossary assets, and all other catalog content.
    • Seamless cloud integration: IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog facilitates a smooth adjustment to the cloud. This makes it no longer necessary to employ an on-premise ecosystem. This move will also result in significantly reduced resource usage and help save on overall administrative costs for the organization.
    Sample Customers
    AP, Square Panda, Aceable
    Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Transportation Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Metadata Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Alation, SAP and others in Metadata Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    data.world is ranked 13th in Metadata Management while IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is ranked 4th in Metadata Management with 9 reviews. data.world is rated 0.0, while IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog writes "A solution that allows for custom assets and data lineages but experiences performance issues when scaling up". data.world is most compared with Alation Data Catalog, Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog and Collibra Catalog, whereas IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is most compared with Alation Data Catalog, IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Collibra Catalog.

    See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

    We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.