Datablink Device 200 vs Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datablink Device 200 and Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
55th
Views
67
Comparisons
55
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
Datablink
Video Not Available
Overview

Datablink Device 200 offers significantly enhanced security compared to traditional tokens. Through patented technology, Datablink Device 200 creates a secure channel with the backend of the financial institution. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing by reading a blinking image and generating a one-time use challenge and response-based dynamic password or signature. Unlike competitive solutions, Datablink Device 200 is a truly intuitive solution that offers unmatched ease of use with its unique screen reading technology.

Datablink Mobile 200 offers advanced authentication and financial transactions signing for organizations and their customers. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing. Rather than requiring a user to physically type a code into a device to generate a one-time password, users simply use their smartphone to confirm their identities. No other devices are required. To verify a user's identity or sign a specific transaction, the organization can choose to employ push technology or use a QR Code that is read by the user's smartphone camera. 

Sample Customers
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Datablink Device 200 is ranked 55th in Authentication Systems while Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. Datablink Device 200 is rated 0.0, while Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Datablink Device 200 is most compared with Swivel Secure PINsafe, whereas Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.