Datablink Device 200 vs In-Webo comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Datablink Logo
67 views|55 comparisons
In-Webo Logo
159 views|138 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datablink Device 200 and In-Webo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
55th
Views
67
Comparisons
55
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
34th
Views
159
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
In-Webo
Video Not Available
Overview

Datablink Device 200 offers significantly enhanced security compared to traditional tokens. Through patented technology, Datablink Device 200 creates a secure channel with the backend of the financial institution. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing by reading a blinking image and generating a one-time use challenge and response-based dynamic password or signature. Unlike competitive solutions, Datablink Device 200 is a truly intuitive solution that offers unmatched ease of use with its unique screen reading technology.

inWebo took a different approach that prevents all 3 common 'flaws' of software+SaaS MFA solutions. We built our authentication algorithms using dynamic and random device credentials. The verification algorithms run within certified HSMs (hardware-security modules) operated in our multi-datacenter infrastructure. From a security standpoint, our solution is equivalent if not better than those 10 years ago. Yet, it also enjoys the flexibility, scalability, and convenience of a software+SaaS solution.
Sample Customers
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Deloitte, Groupama, Carrefour, Renater, Accor, Samsung, Sodexo, Pixia, Affirm, Safran, Locarchives
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Datablink Device 200 is ranked 55th in Authentication Systems while In-Webo is ranked 34th in Authentication Systems. Datablink Device 200 is rated 0.0, while In-Webo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Datablink Device 200 is most compared with Swivel Secure PINsafe, whereas In-Webo is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.