Compare DataCore SANsymphony SDS vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

DataCore SANsymphony SDS is ranked 4th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 22 reviews while Red Hat Gluster Storage which is ranked 13th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review. DataCore SANsymphony SDS is rated 9.2, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DataCore SANsymphony SDS writes "Provides HA virtualized storage independent of storage type or vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "The price tag is good compared to the amount of data and high availability provided". DataCore SANsymphony SDS is most compared with VMware vSAN, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct and Pure Storage FlashArray, whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, LizardFS and IBM Spectrum Scale.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, StarWind, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: August 2019.
359,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The ability to pool the storage to leverage thin-provisioning is a huge saving in space and costs.Supporting of Automated-Storage-Tiering (AST) is a good feature that saves money.DataCore's ability to seamlessly move virtual volume data between storage pools as well as their synchronous mirroring has made maintenance and disaster recovery planning achievable.DataCore has helped provide flexible, highly available, high-performance storage that otherwise would have been outside our price range.The features I have found most valuable are the active-active, or so-called grid technology, and the integration into our VMware-vCenter.I'd have to say that the biggest improvement gained by using SANsymphony has to be the performance of the product.The most valuable feature for us is that we can adjust the size of the storage very easily, without stopping production.Good security with this solution.

Read more »

The price tag is good compared to the amount of data and high availability provided.

Read more »

Cons
Having an enterprise "Storage Dashboard" that can show capacity, usage, performance, and any issues would be very beneficial.We are waiting for container support (on the roadmap), as well as a user-friendly full web-administration capability, and an improved API.DataCore needs a more efficient and better way to keep track of metrics and counters so that we can do baseline analysis to measure performance.The cost is becoming prohibitive since they moved to a subscription model.I think an easier way to open a service call, right through the DataCore GUI, would be an improvement, especially when there is an urgent issue.There is no way of quickly matching the exact size of a vDisk to a disk pool.The alert system could have more features.I would like for it to improve into a more ergonomic management console and a translation into the French language. It should have some process for a shutdown of a VM properly in case of a problem.

Read more »

The system should be more intuitive and easier to manage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This solution allows the use of off-the-shelf hardware and charges by the TB of storage.Make sure you are made aware of the annual subscription cost when purchasing.The cost is at the same level as other storage solutions and it is easy to understand the licensing.The pricing and licensing are better with DataCore.

Read more »

If you need cheap storage, but still need high availability, it's a good product to look at.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
359,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,694
Comparisons
1,486
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
277
Avg. Rating
9.3
Views
3,523
Comparisons
2,778
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
327
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
DataCore SANsymphony, SANsymphony, DataCore Virtual SANRed Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
Learn
DataCore
Red Hat
Overview
DataCore™ SANsymphony™ enterprise-class Software-defined Storage (SDS) platform provides a high-performance, highly available and agile storage infrastructure with the lowest Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

Offer
Learn more about DataCore SANsymphony SDS
Learn more about Red Hat Gluster Storage
Sample Customers
Volkswagen , Maimonides Medical Center, The Biodesign Institute, ISCO Industries, Pee Dee Electric Cooperative, United Financial Credit Union, Derby Supply Chain Solutions, Mission Community Hospital, Bellarmine College Preparatory, Colby-Sawyer College, Mount Sinai Health System, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Quorn Foods, Bitburger, University of Birmingham, Stadtverwaltung Heidelberg, NetEnt to name a few. NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government23%
Manufacturing Company15%
Transportation Company15%
Non Profit15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company27%
Government23%
Software R&D Company13%
Health, Wellness And Fitness Company13%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, StarWind, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: August 2019.
359,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email