Compare DataCore SANsymphony SDS vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, Zadara and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2021.
513,091 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Supporting of Automated-Storage-Tiering (AST) is a good feature that saves money.""During the maintenance periods, on any part of the storage or VMware migration, we have had no downtime.""The ability to pool the storage to leverage thin-provisioning is a huge saving in space and costs.""It provides high performance and business-critical storage.""The interface is user-friendly.""It's a software storage solution that can scale as we like. There is also has a parallel feature that enhances the performance of the storage solution. We can separate storage and computing, and we can scale these two parts of the platform to meet business needs efficiently."

More DataCore SANsymphony SDS Pros »

"It's very easy to upgrade storage."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Pros »

Cons
"We are waiting for container support (on the roadmap), as well as a user-friendly full web-administration capability, and an improved API.""I think the performance reporting can be improved by adding historical statistics into a database for the purpose of comparing.""Having an enterprise "Storage Dashboard" that can show capacity, usage, performance, and any issues would be very beneficial.""I miss dedupe and decompression.""I would like to see reporting added, such as a monthly connectivity report.""Problem detection could be easier. It should help customers identify problems very quickly because it's not easy to analyze on the platform today."

More DataCore SANsymphony SDS Cons »

"The user interface could be simplified."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution allows the use of off-the-shelf hardware and charges by the TB of storage.""Pricing has improved but it is still expensive.""This product has a good ratio between quality and price. In many cases, it's less expensive to work with DataCore than other storage systems."

More DataCore SANsymphony SDS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
513,091 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,329
Comparisons
3,292
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
420
Rating
9.6
Views
4,923
Comparisons
3,671
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
242
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
DataCore SANsymphony, SANsymphony, DataCore Virtual SAN
Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
Learn More
Overview

DataCore™ SANsymphony™ enterprise-class Software-defined Storage (SDS) platform provides a high-performance, highly available and agile storage infrastructure with the lowest Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

Offer
Learn more about DataCore SANsymphony SDS
Learn more about Red Hat Gluster Storage
Sample Customers
Volkswagen, Maimonides Medical Center, The Biodesign Institute, ISCO Industries, Pee Dee Electric Cooperative, United Financial Credit Union, Derby Supply Chain Solutions, Mission Community Hospital, Bellarmine College Preparatory, Colby-Sawyer College, Mount Sinai Health System, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Quorn Foods, Bitburger, University of Birmingham, Stadtverwaltung Heidelberg, NetEnt to name a few.
NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Profit40%
Manufacturing Company12%
Government12%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company26%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider28%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise41%
Large Enterprise15%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, Zadara and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2021.
513,091 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DataCore SANsymphony SDS is ranked 5th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 7 reviews while Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 17th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review. DataCore SANsymphony SDS is rated 9.6, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of DataCore SANsymphony SDS writes "Provides HA virtualized storage independent of storage type or vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "Easy to upgrade but the interface should be simplified". DataCore SANsymphony SDS is most compared with VMware vSAN, StarWind Virtual SAN, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, HPE SimpliVity and StorMagic SvSAN, whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct and LizardFS.

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.