Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The interface is user-friendly.
It provides high performance and business-critical storage.
The ability to pool the storage to leverage thin-provisioning is a huge saving in space and costs.
During the maintenance periods, on any part of the storage or VMware migration, we have had no downtime.
Supporting of Automated-Storage-Tiering (AST) is a good feature that saves money.
DataCore's ability to seamlessly move virtual volume data between storage pools as well as their synchronous mirroring has made maintenance and disaster recovery planning achievable.
DataCore has helped provide flexible, highly available, high-performance storage that otherwise would have been outside our price range.
The features I have found most valuable are the active-active, or so-called grid technology, and the integration into our VMware-vCenter.
This is a good solution for medium-sized installations especially when it will be coupled with VMware.
The recent technologies and management features that have been implemented.
The solution is perfect for the lifecycle management of hardware.
The update process is very convenient.
The stability is very good. We haven't had any issues at all. There aren't bugs or glitches. There aren't system crashes or anything of that nature.
VxRail's feature that we found most valuable was its really good performance. That was one of VxRail's advantages.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the automation and integration points with other automation tools.
I like the new releases that Dell EMC is doing with VMware. They are allowing for flexibility across the hybrid cloud. This allows organizations to use containers and to be able to move into the public cloud, but also not have lock-in. They can come back to the private cloud when they want to, so it's creating a lot of flexibility across the stack.
I would like to see reporting added, such as a monthly connectivity report.
I miss dedupe and decompression.
Having an enterprise "Storage Dashboard" that can show capacity, usage, performance, and any issues would be very beneficial.
I think the performance reporting can be improved by adding historical statistics into a database for the purpose of comparing.
We are waiting for container support (on the roadmap), as well as a user-friendly full web-administration capability, and an improved API.
DataCore needs a more efficient and better way to keep track of metrics and counters so that we can do baseline analysis to measure performance.
The cost is becoming prohibitive since they moved to a subscription model.
I think an easier way to open a service call, right through the DataCore GUI, would be an improvement, especially when there is an urgent issue.
There is a limitation on the number of nodes.
Troubleshooting can be a little more difficult than legacy systems.
Pricing could be improved.
The licensing costs are too expensive. They should work on their pricing model.
The price should come down a little bit. It has become better than it was at the beginning. There was a really big price difference between a hyper-converged infrastructure and the classic servers and storage. The gap is lessening, however, it's still there.
It should not be deployed on one hypervisor. There should be multiple hypervisors supported like Hyper-V or KVM.
It's not really flexible with different use cases.
Having a native replication would be an improvement.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing has improved but it is still expensive.
This solution allows the use of off-the-shelf hardware and charges by the TB of storage.
Make sure you are made aware of the annual subscription cost when purchasing.
The cost is at the same level as other storage solutions and it is easy to understand the licensing.
The pricing and licensing are better with DataCore.
It is just as cheap to move over to an HCI solution as it is to maintain a legacy system.
A typical node that I would sell to a customer has a list price be between $80,000 and $100,000 per node. Organizations typically start with four nodes. That's the hardware, software, VMware licensing, everything. Customers typically pay about half of that - approximately $45,000 to $50,000 a node. On average, it costs about $200,000 to get your foot in the door.
The real ROI is the benefit of being able to do a true hybrid cloud, not having to move from CAPEX to OPEX in a pure break.
There is an administrative cost savings. Instead of having seven to 15 separate boxes that someone has to administer on 15 different terminals, you can do the majority of it from one interface. Therefore, it saves on manpower costs.
We were expecting Dell EMC to bring us something that would work very quickly and easily, but also be at a reasonable price point, and they did.
The price point needs improvement, certainly for smaller SMBs. The cost of it is still quite painful. I think all vendors should do a product which is capped either by terabytes, IOPs, or VM instances. It should be an SMB solution that's going to make hyper-converged solutions easier for SMBs to get hold of. It's fine for those big guys that have billions of dollars of budget, but not for customers who have barely a 100,000 dollars or pounds in budget.
The price is a little bit on the higher side but the system and management are so quick and easy that it's worth it for the customer.
We most likely pay yearly for support. The cost was justified by now because it stays up and I don't have to constantly open tickets. I probably rebooted the system once or twice. We haven't replaced any discs in the storage, we haven't had to do any disc replacements, so it just runs. You pay a little more but you cut down on the maintenance.
out of 47 in Hyper-Converged (HCI)
Average Words per Review
out of 47 in Hyper-Converged (HCI)
Average Words per Review
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
|DataCore SANsymphony, SANsymphony, DataCore Virtual SAN||VCE VxRail|
DataCore™ SANsymphony™ enterprise-class Software-defined Storage (SDS) platform provides a high-performance, highly available and agile storage infrastructure with the lowest Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).
VxRail is the only fully integrated, preconfigured, and pre-tested VMware hyper-converged infrastructure appliance family on the market. Based on VMware’s vSphere and Virtual SAN, and EMC software, VxRail delivers an all-in-one IT infrastructure transformation by leveraging a known and proven building block for the Software Defined Data Center (SDDC).
With the power of a whole SAN in just two rack units, they provide a simple, cost effective hyper-converged solution for a wide variety of applications and workloads. VxRail Appliances deliver resiliency, QoS, and centralized management functionality enabling faster, better, and simpler management of consolidated workloads, virtual desktops, business-critical applications, and remote office infrastructure.
Learn more about DataCore SANsymphony SDS
Learn more about VxRail
|Volkswagen, Maimonides Medical Center, The Biodesign Institute, ISCO Industries, Pee Dee Electric Cooperative, United Financial Credit Union, Derby Supply Chain Solutions, Mission Community Hospital, Bellarmine College Preparatory, Colby-Sawyer College, Mount Sinai Health System, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Quorn Foods, Bitburger, University of Birmingham, Stadtverwaltung Heidelberg, NetEnt to name a few.||World Wide Technology Inc, Renault Sport Formula One Team, 8x8 Inc, Brownes, Canadian Pacific, Canopy, Denton, EDF, Unilin, Xerox|
Computer Software Company25%
Real Estate/Law Firm15%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm14%
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider12%
See our list of best Hyper-Converged (HCI) vendors.