We performed a comparison between Datadog and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The dashboards are great."
"It is easy to implement and scale applications with standardized visibility, monitoring and alerting"
"Sometimes it's more user friendly for development teams. There are some parts of Datadog that are more understandable for development teams. For example, the APM in Datadog works more manually and works like the tools in New Relic or Grafana, or Elastic. It is easier to understand for software development teams."
"I like that you can build out a dashboard pretty quickly. There are some things that come out of the box that you don't really need to do, which is great because they're default settings."
"The network map is crucial in identifying bottlenecks and determining what needs more attention."
"The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart."
"We've been able to glean from the monitors what servers are down, and can alert the team in Slack."
"Overall, the Data UI and the usability of customer features continue to improve."
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Sometimes, it takes a long time to load the dashboard if we have many charts."
"At the beginning, when we started throwing logs at it, there was a bit of hiccup. However, this was during their beta period, so hiccups were expected."
"One area where I was really looking for improvement was the CSPM product line. I had really wanted to have team-level visibility for findings, since the team managing the resources has much more context and ability to resolve the issue, as the service owner. However, this has been added to the announcement in a recent keynote."
"Lately, chat support has a longer waiting time."
"Datadog lacks a deeper application-level insight. Their competitors had eclipsed them in offering ET functionality that was important to us. That's why we stopped using it and switched to New Relic. Datadog's price is also high."
"It does not have the best interface."
"The pricing should be less of a surprise."
"I would like testing for data in the future."
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 2nd in Network Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is ranked 60th in Network Monitoring Software with 5 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor writes "It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is most compared with Zabbix.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.