We performed a comparison between Alluvio Aternity and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Alluvio Aternity provides useful functionalities including monitoring machine health and performance data, tracking desktop application usage, offering customization options, measuring UXI score, and ensuring endpoint visibility. Datadog offers dashboards, error reporting, a user-friendly interface, log analysis, and infrastructure monitoring capabilities. Alluvio Aternity has opportunities to enhance its reporting capabilities, customization of asset management, performance counters, and options for monitoring databases. Datadog could improve in terms of usability, integration, intuitiveness of user interfaces, learning curve, monitoring external websites, and SSL security, among other areas.
Service and Support: Alluvio Aternity's customer service provides prompt and skilled technical support, ensuring high levels of satisfaction. Although local support is available, more complex technical inquiries may require assistance from overseas engineers. Datadog's customer service has received varied feedback, with some users praising its helpful and responsive nature. However, others have encountered slow or unresponsive support, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Alluvio Aternity was praised for being excellent, simple, and convenient. It involved installing agents on PCs using Microsoft's SCCM solution. The setup for Datadog was generally seen as uncomplicated and direct, although some users found it slightly intricate and necessitated additional adjustments or collaboration with multiple teams.
Pricing: Users generally find the setup cost for Alluvio to be affordable and satisfactory. Opinions regarding Datadog's pricing and licensing are mixed. Some users perceive Datadog as costly and perplexing, while others find it reasonable when compared to alternative options.
ROI: Alluvio emphasizes expense management for ROI, while Datadog's ROI has a range of outcomes, including positive sentiments and the possibility for growth.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Alluvio Aternity is recommended over Datadog due to its straightforward and intuitive setup process. Users appreciate Alluvio Aternity for its effortless deployment of agents and low maintenance requirements. Furthermore, Alluvio Aternity offers valuable insights into machine health and performance, customization options, and an easily navigable interface. Ultimately, the simplicity and user-friendly nature of Alluvio Aternity make it the preferred option.
"As a financial institution, we have a lot of applications that are either written internally or bought from a vendor and customized for us. Having a tool that lets us monitor specific transactions in those applications allows us to focus on the transactions that are important to the business."
"It is useful for working out whether there are any issues in the network or between the endpoints. It is also useful for working out any performance issues. It has been useful for a lot of stuff around Teams. Our customers like to know what's happening with Teams when they call in. It is helpful for easily profiling users. It records all the applications that are being used for each user, and you can see what users are doing. It is very good in terms of performance. You don't have to wait forever to try and get reports or results. It is quite quick to get everything that you need out of the software."
"The most valuable feature for us is trend analysis, particularly with device-help type of events and computer help events, such as blue screens, application errors, and application crashes."
"The data collected by the agents on each end point is the most valuable feature for us."
"All of it, but it depends on who the end user is. The folks that support the applications, like the signatures that we've developed, it gives them feedback on their application performance."
"While it also provides desktop metrics, the main thing we use it for is monitoring our applications."
"The most valuable feature is the application performance troubleshooting because Aternity is able to provide the performance from the end-user perspective. It doesn't just give the standard application logon time, etc., rather it's also able to measure the performance inside the application, the performance of specific transactions in the application, and break it down into three elements: the client time, the network time, and the server time. This gives us a lot of insights into what we need to focus on to improve the performance of an application."
"The detailed level of information you are able to get on the complete environment all of the way down to a specific machine."
"The dashboards and the performance of the software have been great."
"The ingestion points are unlimited and support customization. We haven't had anything yet that we haven't been able to integrate with it."
"Datadog helps us detect issues early on and helps in troubleshooting."
"We enjoy the multistep API tests."
"Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate."
"Having a clear view, not only of our infrastructure but our apps and services as well, has brought a great added value to our customers."
"Datadog has clear dashboards and good documentation."
"The product has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"When it comes to a lot of the features that I would want, they will tell you they are in their SaaS version, which we don't use... They put all the new features on the SaaS solution and that's where you get the latest and greatest stuff... Why not have those features available for on-prem users?"
"Aternity doesn't currently provide metrics about actual employee experience of all business-critical apps. It's something you have to build out. It's not 'canned' that way and there is a lot of configuration that you have to do to the environment to collect the data you want to collect and that is important to you."
"Signature development process requires deep technical expertise in the application and in the use of their studio tools that help you create it."
"The dashboards and navigatability of the platform could use improvement. It often takes five or six clicks to drill down to exactly what you want to see."
"I can see the location and computer model and I can see a bunch of different attributes. But one thing I can't see is the Internet Explorer version."
"I think the workflow needs improvement"
"I would say the reporting capabilities of this product could use room for improvement."
"Its user interface and features should be improved. They don't support new versions of certain Linux editions. That is one of the reasons why we have to move to another solution."
"The documentation could be improved regarding setting up the agent properly and debugging."
"One thing we have run into is that it is so easy to add monitoring that we turn on things without really understanding the costs."
"We have contact with many customers that cover many areas, so we have cases where the infrastructure administration could be improved."
"For three to four months, we have been experiencing real-time delays. For example, if we're monitoring incoming traffic, the real-time status should be displayed up to a certain point. However, due to delays or issues with Datadog, the real-time data might only be updated at an earlier time. We are experiencing consistent delays in data updates from Datadog, with the most recent data often being delayed by about an hour. This issue has been ongoing for the past four months."
"ECS could be improved by including more tutorials for beginners to reduce the barriers to entry."
"Datadog isn't as mature as some of the established players like Dynatrace or Splunk. It's a new product, so they are constantly releasing new features, and I don't have much to complain about."
"Datadog could always lower the price!"
"Datadog does not have the feature where you can monitor external websites or check the SSL secure for websites."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 19th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 37 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Not only helped us know which devices to refresh, but helped us determine if a refresh was even necessary, with factual data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, SysTrack, AppDynamics and New Relic, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.