We performed a comparison between Avantra and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can customize alerts based on need."
"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"Datadog is easy to use and easy to deploy. It's a better solution compared to others on the market in terms of being budget friendly for our customers."
"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."
"It helps us better manage our logs."
"The service catalog helped improve our organization by giving a good view of the flow for our microservices applications."
"The solution allows flexibility and heightened observability for presenting data, creating indicators, and setting service-level objectives."
"Datadog helps us detect issues early on and helps in troubleshooting."
"Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features."
"The solution has improved the organization by providing good insights into app performance and offering good dashboards."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"One area where I was really looking for improvement was the CSPM product line. I had really wanted to have team-level visibility for findings, since the team managing the resources has much more context and ability to resolve the issue, as the service owner. However, this has been added to the announcement in a recent keynote."
"I would love to see support for front-end and mobile applications. Right now, it is mostly all back-end stuff. Being able to do some integration with our front-end products would be awesome."
"Billing should be more transparent."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server."
"More granular control over dashboard sharing. Timeboard sharing."
"The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does."
"To be very fair, I haven't had enough experience with Datadog to pick out improvements."
Avantra is ranked 38th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 136 reviews. Avantra is rated 8.6, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Avantra is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and OpsRamp, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics. See our Avantra vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.