Compare Datadog vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront

Datadog is ranked 5th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 10 reviews while VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is ranked 9th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 6 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.0, while VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "They have a good ecosystem for their integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront writes "Simplifies troubleshooting by identifying trends from different data sources". Datadog is most compared with Splunk, Dynatrace and New Relic APM, whereas VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace and AppDynamics. See our Datadog vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This is definitely a good product and I would consider them one of the leaders within the application monitoring and cloud monitoring space.It has enhanced the performance of my team.It provides more cloud data. They tend to just get the way a service would be designed on the cloud.It has saved us a lot of trouble in implementation.The ease with which we can filter, use metrics, and give accounts to customers, then let the customer filter, set up metrics, and alerts. This has been a big win for us.The integration and configuration are incredibly simple. The SaaS offering is remarkably easy to set up, especially if you're coming from a Graphite environment or anything that uses a StatsD.The ingestion points are unlimited and support customization. We haven't had anything yet that we haven't been able to integrate with it.If we have a large load for users using our basic Datadog, it will immediately fire off an alert notifying us either something's wrong or not.

Read more »

No issues with stability.The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.People are very pleased with the implementation.The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.

Read more »

Cons
Additional metrics should be included.The product could do better with its notifications.It does not have the best interface.Stability of the product has been a concern for us outside of the primary monitoring agents.It lacks consistency in the APIs.There are things about it that we would like to be fixed, such as it is taking averages of average. This results in data that we don't expect.We have asked technical support questions, and sometimes they don't get back to us right away. Or when they do, it is not the right answer.I would love to see support for front-end and mobile applications. Right now, it is mostly all back-end stuff. Being able to do some integration with our front-end products would be awesome.

Read more »

It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality.They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.The implementation is a long process that should be improved.In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship.It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back.The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items.It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.Pricing and licensing are reasonable for what they give you. You get the first five hosts free, which is fun to play around with. Then it's about four dollars a month per host, which is very affordable for what you get out of it. We have a lot of hosts that we put a lot of custom metrics into, and every host gives you an allowance for the number of custom metrics.

Read more »

Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD.Educational pricing is available for this solution.We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
24,936
Comparisons
20,365
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
533
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
4,921
Comparisons
3,954
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
534
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability
Learn
Datadog
VMware
Overview
Datadog is a monitoring service for IT, Dev and Ops teams who write and run applications at scale, and want to turn the massive amounts of data produced by their apps, tools and services into actionable insight.

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

Offer
Learn more about Datadog
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Sample Customers
Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby'sBox, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, Lyft
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Media Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company8%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Retailer10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business57%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise58%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,214 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.