We performed a comparison between Dataloader.io and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its ease of use. We do not depend on any tool to develop it. Everything is on the browser and is easy to integrate, even for someone who does not understand a lot about coding."
"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"It has lengthy documentation, making the process of building applications more time-consuming."
"The solution is expensive."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"The logging capabilities could be enhanced. Currently, logs are only retained for a few days, which can be inconvenient for administrators. Ideally, we'd like the option to configure log retention periods, like a month or fifteen days, instead of the current one-week limit."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dataloader.io is ranked 39th in Data Integration with 1 review while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Dataloader.io is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dataloader.io writes "Provides an ease of access and an automated mapping feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Dataloader.io is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, DBamp and BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.