We performed a comparison between Dataloader.io and Zapier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."
"Zapier's interface, for me, is the solution's greatest value proposition. It is designed and developed for people who don't have a clue about what they're trying to do. It has a very user-friendly interface."
"With the previous CRM we were using – the Google Ads landing pages we had – we were collecting leads manually. That process was not efficient and took a sales team a lot of time to insert these leads manually. Currently, the process is smooth and we use Zapier to collect the leads for us."
"The solution is a SaaS and does not require a complex setup."
"Zapier is user friendly and makes it easy to integrate different tools. It has a drag and drop functionality which makes it easy to connect environments."
"We find it effortless to set up. We really don't have to do anything other than finding the application in the Zapier catalog. And as long as the application has been re-integrated into Zapier, they're able to then just provide the connection details and hook it up."
"There are a few valuable features, like the stability that it comes with and also the number of features that it offers. I've used other services like Pabbly, but they don't offer similar numbers of applications that Zapier has or allows to integrate with – it's maximum."
"Zapier handles everything under the sun that you would think you need in automation. It is the most mature integration platform and service on the market."
"The product's most valuable feature is automation."
"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."
"My biggest concern with Zapier would be their pricing strategy."
"Being able to share Zaps and organize them with teammates would allow sharing and refining scenarios and even combining steps that require different people's credentials."
"There is room for improvement in the support. They are not responsive, and they don't take much time to get resolved."
"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."
"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"
"I think that this solution should have more apps connected to it."
"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."
"At the moment, they allow a limited number of apps. I look forward to getting more apps for each package."
Dataloader.io is ranked 36th in Data Integration with 1 review while Zapier is ranked 10th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Dataloader.io is rated 8.0, while Zapier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dataloader.io writes "Provides an ease of access and an automated mapping feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zapier writes "A tool for automation purposes requiring an easy initial setup while offering a very helpful technical support team ". Dataloader.io is most compared with DBamp, Mule Anypoint Platform and AWS AppSync, whereas Zapier is most compared with AWS Glue, Alteryx Designer, Tray.io, MuleSoft Composer and Coefficient.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.