• Home
  • Datera vs. NetApp HCI [EOL]

Datera vs NetApp HCI [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Datera Logo

Datera

48 views|42 comparisons
NetApp Logo

NetApp HCI [EOL]

Read 32 NetApp HCI [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datera and NetApp HCI [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Datera?
Massimiliano Bartolozzi
Crashed continuously, complex to deploy, and bad after-sales support - NETAPP FIXED the problems in 2022
It has increased the availability of our systems from 12 hours for 6 days to 18 hours for 7 days. Because the NetApp system is faster than the ones... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This solution saved our organization time (35 percent) and money. We have a hefty group of developers, and if you multiply that by 30 to 35 percent, that is quite a bit of money."
  • "Where we lost nearly 75 percent of our infrastructure due to a malicious attack and were able to recover two and a half hours into it due to the integration, it saved us and all of our customers. Because we were able to recover so fast from the attack, the solution paid for itself right there."
  • "There are the overall infrastructure costs. Even though the initial costing was higher, we calculated for year-to-year for five years. That brought us into a position where we decided, we have to go for HCI rather than having distributor systems."
  • "All the licenses are included when you buy the program."
  • "You still have to pay for the licensing for VMware and Red Hat licenses separately. It's not all inclusive at this point."
  • "This solution reduced our maintenance costs. We were going to have to pay one to two million dollars to put in compute nodes. We are avoiding those costs."
  • "Licenses run on a yearly basis, and there aren't any additional fees other than the standard licensing fee."
  • "The licensing fees are renewed annually."

    • More NetApp HCI [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    34th
    out of 37 in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    Views
    48
    Comparisons
    42
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Datera
    NetApp
    Overview

    Today, IT executives, cloud architects, storage administrators and DevOps managers are frustrated by the growing complexities of data management and storage in their datacenters. It is impossible for IT to efficiently and optimally satisfy the price-performance requirements of enterprise applications. In many cases, IT organizations are putting in enormous amount of months, increasing operating expenses and overspending (by as much as 5X) for storage performance and capacity for applications and data management. This is because they are forced to choose different storage infrastructures to meet each requirement.

    IT Professionals can now take their weekends back. No longer do they need to choose. They can have it all with Datera Elastic Data Fabric block storage software.

    You can have high-performance and reliability of enterprise class storage arrays while also having a simplified automated data management infrastructure with hyperscale cloud-like capabilities — all on-premises.

    NetApp HCI is the only true enterprise-scale hyper converged cloud infrastructure. NetApp HCI comes in a 2 RU chassis with 4 node expansion slots.

    Sample Customers
    Cadence, Packet, Schuberg Philis, Teuto.net
    American Showa, Children's Mercy, Coca-Cola, Consultel Cloud, Evangelische Landeskirche in Wurttemberg, Imperva, Surface Mount Technology
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Pharma/Biotech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Datera is ranked 34th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while NetApp HCI [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 32 reviews. Datera is rated 0.0, while NetApp HCI [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp HCI [EOL] writes "Ease of provisioning has allowed us to implement large installations in a very short time frame". Datera is most compared with , whereas NetApp HCI [EOL] is most compared with .

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.