• Home
  • DDN WOS [EOL] vs. Hitachi Content Platform

DDN WOS [EOL] vs Hitachi Content Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DataDirect Networks Logo

DDN WOS [EOL]

views| comparisons
Hitachi Vantara Logo

Hitachi Content Platform

Read 12 Hitachi Content Platform reviews
1,647 views|1,014 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
File and Object Storage
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DDN WOS [EOL] and Hitachi Content Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed File and Object Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use DDN WOS [EOL]?
Mir Gulzar Ahmed
Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is comparable to other solutions in the market."
  • "The pricing could be better."
  • "The price of the Hitachi Content Platform is very high."
  • "Overall, it's costly."
  • "I think the ROI for this solution is very good because the pricing for it is in between other solutions."
  • "The product’s cost is average."
  • "Hitachi is more expensive than StorageGRID."

    • More Hitachi Content Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Hitachi Content Platform?
    Top Answer:Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging.
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Hitachi Content Platform?
    Top Answer:The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. So it can be more user-friendly. Another area of improvement is support. Technical support needs… more »
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Hitachi Content Platform?
    Top Answer:We proposed its consultation to our clients and have explored it further. This is important because we partnered with HST, who provided a demonstration box and shipped it from UAE to Pakistan for the… more »
    Read all 8 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In File and Object Storage
    15th
    out of 49 in File and Object Storage
    Views
    1,647
    Comparisons
    1,014
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    520
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WOS
    HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
    Learn More
    DataDirect Networks
    Hitachi Vantara
    Overview

    DDN WOS is the most comprehensive object storage solution that is purpose-built to address the relentless growth of data in the most adaptable and efficient manner—all with the absolute minimum storage management required. Designed for a wide range of applications and use cases, WOS enables the creation of an almost limitless Exascale storage pool that delivers predictable and reliable high-performance at any scale.

    Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

    Sample Customers
    Airbus, BP, PayPal, SAS, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Indiana University, Symantec
    Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    File and Object Storage
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    DDN WOS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in File and Object Storage while Hitachi Content Platform is ranked 15th in File and Object Storage with 12 reviews. DDN WOS [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Hitachi Content Platform is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi Content Platform writes " Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement". DDN WOS [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Hitachi Content Platform is most compared with Dell ECS, MinIO, NetApp StorageGRID, Red Hat Ceph Storage and Dell PowerScale (Isilon).

    See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

    We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.