Dell BiTKOO Keystone [EOL] vs Oracle Entitlements Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Authorization Software
5th
Views
64
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
BiTKOO Keystone
Entitlements Server
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available
Oracle Entitlements Server (OES) is a standards-based, policy-driven security solution that provides real time fine-grained authorization in Application, Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and Database environments. OES fills the need for granular, flexible, and externalized access control. The solution provides a comprehensive and centralized approach for managing access policies with distributed or centralized enforcement. Authorization policy management and runtime enforcement is provided for sensitive applications, databases, containers (such as Java, .NET), portals and content management systems (such as WebCenter and SharePoint), development frameworks, object relational mapping technologies, intermediaries (such as XML gateways and ESB's), web services, and SOA infrastructure.
Sample Customers
Imerys, Aurora Public Schools, Instrumentation Laboratory, Hutt City Council, RINGSPANN, KMC Solutions
Symmetry Ltd., National Social Insurance Fund for Employees, UL LLC

Dell BiTKOO Keystone [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authorization Software while Oracle Entitlements Server is ranked 5th in Authorization Software. Dell BiTKOO Keystone [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Oracle Entitlements Server is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Dell BiTKOO Keystone [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Entitlements Server is most compared with .

See our list of best Authorization Software vendors.

We monitor all Authorization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.