Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs Fivetran comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Boomi Logo
2,246 views|1,564 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Fivetran Logo
4,412 views|2,978 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Fivetran based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Fivetran Report (Updated: July 2023).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations.""It has been a stable product.""This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background.""I like the tool's optimization feature.""The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful.""Low-code development is the most valuable feature.""The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool.""The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pros →

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well.""The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it.""Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target.""The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure.""There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,.""The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering.""Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors.""The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

More Fivetran Pros →

Cons
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration.""The product's UI could be more convenient.""The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities.""There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow.""Documentation could be improved.""The product could be a little bit more user-friendly.""In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Cons →

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks.""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services.""I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies.""I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded.""HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed.""Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs.""Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

More Fivetran Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
  • "They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
  • "The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
  • "This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
  • "The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
  • "When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
  • "The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
  • "Approximately 20k annually."
  • More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."
  • "I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."
  • "Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."
  • "I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."
  • "In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."
  • "I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."
  • "The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."
  • "The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."
  • More Fivetran Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have worked as an Integration Architect/Developer for many years and have used Mulesoft, Boomi, Informatica, Workato, Celigo, SSIS and many other integration tools.  The tool you would pick depends… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for… more »
    Top Answer:Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
    Top Answer:As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become some… more »
    Top Answer: I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can… more »
    Top Answer:As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Software… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,246
    Comparisons
    1,564
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    7.4
    13th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    4,412
    Comparisons
    2,978
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    603
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

    Fivetran is a data integration and migration solution that centralizes data from various sources into a data warehouse (such as Snowflake or BigQuery) for analytics. Its most valuable features include replication and managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and many source connections. 

    Fivetran is easy to use, with fast data migration and an intuitive portal for easy setup and troubleshooting. It has helped organizations integrate and manage data, saving time and resources.

    Sample Customers
    DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
    DocuSign, Oldcastle Infrastructure, Crossmedia, Talkdesk, Chubbies, Brandwatch
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    Retailer8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company42%
    Outsourcing Company17%
    Transportation Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Fivetran
    July 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Fivetran and other solutions. Updated: July 2023.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Fivetran is ranked 13th in Data Integration with 19 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Fivetran is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fivetran writes "Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Fivetran is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Azure Data Factory, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica Cloud Data Integration. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Fivetran report.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.