We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Informatica PowerExchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"It is easy to integrate the solution with other tools."
"The agentless RCDC enablement through PowerExchange is a great idea and has worked very well so far."
"Mainstream integration and real-time integration are the best features."
"The solution can connect to different systems i.e. mainframe, IMS or AS/400 Legacy Systems."
"The scalability is excellent."
"Overall, it's a good tool. It's currently number one on the market. It pretty much has all the necessary capabilities to pull the incremental data from the source system, technically speaking."
"Provides a significant amount of control over the landscape and overall implementation."
"From the product feature or product capability perspective, the aspects around integration, transformation, and standardization are valuable. It's fairly easy to use. It has a GUI-based interface."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"V10.2 is very stable, but we are still struggling to make V10.5 stable. We found services that were down, and PowerExchange stopped working."
"The product is not suitable for application integration."
"Pushdown optimization could be improved."
"The solution could be made more user-friendly. The configurations are also quite difficult."
"Apache Spark has a machine learning algorithm, an area where Informatica PowerExchange lacks."
"The major shortcoming of PowerExchange is high availability and failover. None of the versions we've used to date have had the out-of-the-box ability to enable failover and high-availability requirements. This is a significant challenge and risk."
"They should make it quick and easy for use of citizen data integration or for people or integrators developing at the customer side. They could be development teams within the business team. For them, the product owners can consider making it a little bit more seamless and a little bit more democratized."
"I would like the stability to improve."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Informatica PowerExchange is ranked 21st in Data Integration with 19 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Informatica PowerExchange is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica PowerExchange writes "Handles big data better than competitors". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Informatica PowerExchange is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory, SSIS and Qlik Replicate. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Informatica PowerExchange report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
