We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to learn and implement."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"It has been a stable product."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 11 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 22 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Offers quick development, an easy setup, and less coding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and TIBCO BusinessWorks, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Azure Data Factory and SAP Process Orchestration. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.