We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud."
"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM App Connect.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.