We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"It is quite expensive."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
