We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager vs. IBM Spectrum Protect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager vs. IBM Spectrum Protect and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The deduplication is the most valuable feature because it helps to control the overhead.""Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is user-friendly and easy to use. it does what it needs to do.""I would say flexibility is the most important feature of the product. The performance and speed are the best on the market."

More Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager Pros »

"Technical support is okay. We have not had many issues with them.""The most valuable feature is the backup speed.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the centralized enterprise backup.""IBM Spectrum Protect is a scalable solution.""One of the main things that I like about IBM is the versioning of the data - meaning that we can have multiple versions of a file or directory of a server.""The backup is very good. In other backup systems, you need a lot of storage to gain the same backup policy.""I find the whole product useful. The backup archive client, snapshot, spectrum for virtual environments are beneficial features.""Good user interface."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Pros »

Cons
"As a new product, there are some things that still need to improve a bit as it matures.""The Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager reports could improve. There should be different kinds of reports on failures, such as dashboards that we can submit to top management or auditors.""There is always room for improvement. The compression ratio should be improved as well as the efficiency."

More Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager Cons »

"The installation process could be simplified.""The main admin console from the UI cannot do anything in the product. It just allows us to maintain, maybe, 30% to 40%. For the rest, we have to use the command line.""IBM Spectrum Protect could be improved by making the installation easier. Once it's implemented, it's okay. IBM started lagging behind when things started moving to storage and cloud-based solutions. Even though they've recently released updates that give cloud-based protection, personally, I still believe they are not up to par with the likes of Rubrik. The entire product is a little bit clumsy because they have co-joined two different products, so it's complex. Even from a sales/explaining to people what it does point of view, it's complex. Whereas, if you take more current products, it's a single box solution. You reel it in, you fire it up, you do a couple of points and clicks, and off you go, whereas the IBM system is seriously complex. There's a lot of training involved and it's a massively difficult product to sell at this point in time.""It has a lot of areas for improvement. Its reporting for job completion or incompletion can be improved. It should also provide a granular recovery, ease of operation, data life cycle management, and media management. It should support a backup in such a format that in case of a disaster, one can start the virtual machine out of the backup itself. Its reliability can also be better. It is also expensive, and their support is also poor.""This product comes up against other products available that are marketed better but the other products that it's in competition with are a single product and this is one of IBM products. If it could be marketed as more for competitors I think that's where it comes short.""We did not see any drawbacks to IBM Spectrum Protect before assisting a customer using Windows that wanted to migrate to using UNIX. IBM Spectrum Protect does not offer an option to migrate from other operating systems.""It can be improved for large file systems with many files. Spectrum Protect can restore large files very well, but if you're restoring millions of little files, it is not as great. At one point, we tried to implement the VMware module with it, and it was awful and terrible. I don't know if that has improved. If it hasn't, this would be one big improvement.""There needs to be a bit more automation."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is reasonable.""The licensing costs and pricing model are based on capacity and the license is easy to upgrade."

More Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of IBM Spectrum Protect is expensive. However, there are a few packages and it is unclear because, for the entry suite they have both options, which are the back-end storage capacity and the front-end storage capacity.""IBM provides an open license policy, which is more like a gentlemen's agreement.""Its licensing is complex, and its price is not really reasonable. It is on the expensive side. IBM, in general, is slightly expensive, but with IBM Spectrum for the virtual environment, they are looking into the aspect of helping customers with the cost and providing a cost-effective solution.""We are paying for support and maintenance on a monthly basis.""We have capacity licensing. We use the front end. The capacity licensing is pretty okay on the licensing price. I used to use the old PVU-based licensing in the early environment, but now we use capacity-based licensing.""I don't have an idea about the pricing. They send that over to someone else, but I know that one of the issues they had was the licensing costs. I don't think they were happy with how they were charged.""It is fairly reasonable as compared to other solutions in the market.""It's very complicated. Licensing is a pain."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is a very good and mature enterprise product. Once it is set up and everything is put in, you don't have to manage it. It actually runs automatically by itself.
Top Answer: The pricing model of this solution is another difficult area, it's very sophisticated in the way they charge. It's based on PBU, which is a type of processor, how, many processors, and you need to put… more »
Top Answer: In terms of features, they've got it all covered. The features they have are quite good. The only downside to it is that it is for an enterprise or big organization. In my opinion, it is not for a… more »
Ranking
Views
3,357
Comparisons
2,425
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
735
Rating
8.5
Views
11,601
Comparisons
7,639
Reviews
33
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
7.8
Comparisons
Also Known As
PowerProtect, Dell EMC PowerProtect
IBM TSM, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
Learn More
Overview

The Dell EMC PowerProtect Software is called a platform and provides data protection, replication and re-use. It supports long-term retention in the public cloud and is described as a multi-cloud product. Dell EMC slide. Backed up data and virtual machines data are live mounted by VMs in client servers.

IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) is a data protection platform that gives enterprises a single point of control and administration for backup and recovery. It is the flagship product in the IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) family. It enables reliable, cost effective backups and fast recovery for virtual, physical and cloud environments of all sizes.
Offer
Learn more about Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager
Learn more about IBM Spectrum Protect
Sample Customers
Rushmore Electric, Melanson Health, Arrow Electronics
CERN, Einstein Healthcare, Nyherji, Allianz Australia, TZM, ABT Online, NCT, Kindred Healthcare Inc., Cobalt Iron, TransGrid, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Cash America, Piedmont Healthcare, RWGV, Arkansas Tech University, British Columbia Institute of Technology
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company17%
Financial Services Firm14%
University8%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise72%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager vs. IBM Spectrum Protect and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
555,139 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is ranked 32nd in Backup and Recovery Software with 3 reviews while IBM Spectrum Protect is ranked 11th in Backup and Recovery Software with 40 reviews. Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is rated 8.4, while IBM Spectrum Protect is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager writes "The ratio of deduplication is very high and it has good performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Protect writes "Great stability, reliability, and scalability, but very difficult to manage and get support". Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is most compared with Dell EMC Avamar, Dell EMC NetWorker, Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault and Nutanix Mine, whereas IBM Spectrum Protect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault, Azure Backup and Cohesity DataProtect. See our Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager vs. IBM Spectrum Protect report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery Software vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.