We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and EDB Postgres Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"The most valuable features of EDB Postgres Replication Server are the many in-built functionalities, such as streaming. When compared to others solutions it is highly secure and does not have any breakage in replication. The replication is very fast. Additionally, in other solutions, the databases need to have a lot of manual intervention but with EDB Postgres Replication Server it is not needed."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"The support is horrible."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"We tried to set up a reverse master-master set up, but currently, it is not available. it can be done only via logical replication using a paid version of BDR or some other technology. They allow like master-master. MySQL has already supported master-master and streaming."
More EDB Postgres Replication Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 17 reviews while EDB Postgres Replication Server is ranked 8th in Data Replication with 1 review. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while EDB Postgres Replication Server is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Ensuring data resilience and business continuity in disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of EDB Postgres Replication Server writes "Beneficial continual replication, helpful support, and high replication performance". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync and NetApp Snapshot, whereas EDB Postgres Replication Server is most compared with JumpMind SymmetricDS and Equalum.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
