We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and Hitachi ShadowImage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"The most valuable feature of Hitachi ShadowImage is high-speed data transfer from one server to another. Other solutions would have problems with transferring 50 TB of data. I also like that Hitachi ShadowImage is easy to use."
"The support is horrible."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"API and script configuration in Hitachi ShadowImage is sometimes complicated, so this is an area for improvement. Another area for improvement is that the Hitachi ShadowImage interface isn't as user-friendly."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 17 reviews while Hitachi ShadowImage is ranked 7th in Data Replication with 1 review. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while Hitachi ShadowImage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Ensuring data resilience and business continuity in disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi ShadowImage writes "Easy to use and can do high-speed data transfers from one server to another". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync and NetApp Snapshot, whereas Hitachi ShadowImage is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy and Hitachi Thin Image Advanced.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
