Anonymous UserTechnical Team Lead at a tech services company
Anonymous UserDatabase Administrator at a manufacturing company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."
"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."
"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."
"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."
Earn 20 points
Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 5th in Data Replication with 3 reviews while HVR Software is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 3 reviews. Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is rated 9.0, while HVR Software is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HVR Software writes "Has one central interface that manages everything and is easy and quick to set up". Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Dell EMC AppSync, NetApp Snapshot, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility and IBM Softek TDMF, whereas HVR Software is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Oracle GoldenGate, AWS Database Migration Service, SSIS and Informatica Cloud Data Integration. See our Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. HVR Software report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.