Compare Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp SnapMirror

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp SnapMirror and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss.The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it.

More Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Pros »

NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions.With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile.They have a very effective dashboard and good reports.This solution is easy to implement and easy to use.The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up.The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration.Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool.The solution is very stable.

More NetApp SnapMirror Pros »

Cons
Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution.The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market.

More Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Cons »

The price needs to be improved.It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications.In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization.We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them.The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better.In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution.The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us.There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution.

More NetApp SnapMirror Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free.

More NetApp SnapMirror Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
437,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss.
Top Answer: It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss.
Top Answer: I would rate it a ten out of ten. It could use an external application on top of its recover points. Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get… more »
Top Answer: NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions.
Top Answer: When a customer thinks about disaster recovery they will usually already be using NetApp storage. Setup costs and pricing are not a big consideration for the customer.
Top Answer: The price needs to be improved. It is not that it is too high, but it would be good to be reduced. There is new technology available that is using storage called NVMe with the drives. We are now using… more »
Ranking
4th
out of 30 in Data Replication
Views
1,089
Comparisons
617
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
289
Avg. Rating
9.0
3rd
out of 30 in Data Replication
Views
1,052
Comparisons
655
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
353
Avg. Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Also Known As
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote ReplicationSnapMirror
Learn
Dell EMC
NetApp
Overview
EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.
Offer
Learn more about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn more about NetApp SnapMirror
Sample Customers
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, PanduitUniversity at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp SnapMirror and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 3 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 3rd in Data Replication with 10 reviews. Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is rated 9.0, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Enables us to make a copy of the data on the main storage and move it to backup storage". Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with Dell EMC AppSync, NetApp Snapshot, IBM Softek TDMF and Symmetrix Remote Data Facility, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Dell EMC AppSync, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility and Vision Solutions Double-Take. See our Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.