Compare Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it.""It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."

More Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Pros »

"The most valuable features of this solution are the snapshot and clone capabilities.""Compared to the traditional way we did backups, with Snapshot it takes us less time. It has improved my organization by saving us time.""This is a very mature product that does exactly what it needs to in taking temporary pictures of data states.""The initial setup was straightforward.""It has a user-friendly interface.""The solution is fast and it doesn't use any disc space at all. You can also take as many snapshots as you like. These are the solution's most valuable features.""SnapMirror and Snapshot are both very reliable products.""The most valuable features of the solution are the repurposing and backup features."

More NetApp Snapshot Pros »

Cons
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market.""Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."

More Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Cons »

"I would like to see cloud features added to the next release of this solution.""Not a perfect ten because there is one point off to give it room for improvement.""Although support is good, the global support is lacking depending on location.""The solution needs to ensure it has higher availability or business continuity.""I think the automation needs some improvement.""The price could be a bit lower.""The company could update their products more regularly.""The solution could include more databases and make it accessible to the DBAs. The automation process should be run in a way where it could be run from the database itself."

More NetApp Snapshot Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The price of this solution is fair.""It's not too expensive.""As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."

More NetApp Snapshot Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: From a functional standpoint, it's been, pretty much bulletproof. I have never gone to a snapshot and not been able to do what I needed to do.
Top Answer: SnapShot functionality itself is not licensed separately, so we can say that the cost is $0, or it's just included in the base price. You need a separate license (or license bundle) if you want… more »
Top Answer: It would be ideal if snapshots were searchable. It's a very manual activity. If I have to go looking for a file in a stack of snapshots, it's mount one and look, mount another and look, etc. That's… more »
Ranking
5th
out of 27 in Data Replication
Views
882
Comparisons
514
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
289
Rating
9.0
1st
out of 27 in Data Replication
Views
1,063
Comparisons
533
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
752
Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn More
Overview
EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.

NetApp Snapshot point-in-time copy software protects data with no performance impact and uses minimal storage space.

Offer
Learn more about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn more about NetApp Snapshot
Sample Customers
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
Mazda
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company9%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Manufacturing Company14%
Comms Service Provider13%
University8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise44%
Large Enterprise11%
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 5th in Data Replication with 3 reviews while NetApp Snapshot is ranked 1st in Data Replication with 11 reviews. Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is rated 9.0, while NetApp Snapshot is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Snapshot writes "Very user-friendly, extremely stable, and scalable". Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Dell EMC AppSync, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility, Hitachi Universal Replicator and IBM Softek TDMF, whereas NetApp Snapshot is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Dell EMC AppSync and EDB Postgres Replication Server. See our Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.