Compare Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss.The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it.

More Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Pros »

We are able to easily do Azure backups and restores.This mature product is the leader in the backup industry with unique features and capabilities for users with advanced backup needs.The most valuable features of the solution are the repurposing and backup features.SnapMirror and Snapshot are both very reliable products.The solution is fast and it doesn't use any disc space at all. You can also take as many snapshots as you like. These are the solution's most valuable features.It has a user-friendly interface.The initial setup was straightforward.This is a very mature product that does exactly what it needs to in taking temporary pictures of data states.

More NetApp Snapshot Pros »

Cons
Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution.The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market.

More Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Cons »

The dashboards are in need of improvement.NetApp needs to take a look at their pricing in comparison to the competition and make the appropriate change to attract more customers and gain in market share.The solution could include more databases and make it accessible to the DBAs. The automation process should be run in a way where it could be run from the database itself.The company could update their products more regularly.The price could be a bit lower.I think the automation needs some improvement.The solution needs to ensure it has higher availability or business continuity.Although support is good, the global support is lacking depending on location.

More NetApp Snapshot Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose.It's not too expensive.The price of this solution is fair.

More NetApp Snapshot Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss.
Top Answer: It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss.
Top Answer: I would rate it a ten out of ten. It could use an external application on top of its recover points. Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get… more »
Top Answer: We are able to easily do Azure backups and restores.
Top Answer: As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose. Once the license expires, you… more »
Top Answer: The dashboards are in need of improvement. The configuration could be improved by providing more options, in particular, during the initial setup phase. It would be helpful if more functionality could… more »
Ranking
4th
out of 30 in Data Replication
Views
1,089
Comparisons
617
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
289
Avg. Rating
9.0
1st
out of 30 in Data Replication
Views
912
Comparisons
417
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
609
Avg. Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 56% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Also Known As
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn
Dell EMC
NetApp
Overview
EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.

NetApp Snapshot point-in-time copy software protects data with no performance impact and uses minimal storage space.

Offer
Learn more about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn more about NetApp Snapshot
Sample Customers
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, PanduitMazda
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 3 reviews while NetApp Snapshot is ranked 1st in Data Replication with 10 reviews. Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is rated 9.0, while NetApp Snapshot is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Snapshot writes "Offers advanced backups with special capabilities and has the unique ability to clone". Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with Dell EMC AppSync, IBM Softek TDMF, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility and NetApp SnapMirror, whereas NetApp Snapshot is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror and Dell EMC AppSync. See our Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.