Dell SD-WAN vs FatPipe SD-WAN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
247 views|204 comparisons
FatPipe Networks Logo
492 views|323 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dell SD-WAN and FatPipe SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions.
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Dell SD-WAN?
Akshay Kharkar
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology.
Top Answer:FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution.
Top Answer:Our client has a data center and all the applications servers and servers are in their data center. We design a solution, for all their branches. If they wanted to access the internet or the… more »
Ranking
Views
247
Comparisons
204
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
492
Comparisons
323
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
270
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
FatPipe Symphony, Symphony, FatPipe Symphony SD-WAN, Symphony SD-WAN
Learn More
Overview

Dell EMC SD-WAN Solution powered by VMware combines purpose-built
networking appliances from Dell EMC with SD-WAN software from VMware in
an all-in-one solution for WAN modernization. VMware has been named a
leader by Gartner in the Magic Quadrant for WAN Edge Infrastructure.*
With simplicity, efficiency, and a full range of flexible support, services and
global supply chain options, Dell EMC SD-WAN Solution delivers a powerful,
all-in-one solution that enables you to transform your network for the Cloud era

Symphony is one of the FatPipe’s products which are offering Software-Defined WAN (SD-WAN) solution. This SD-WAN solution simplifies the deployment and management of connectivity at remote sites. More over enterprises deploying Symphony with Orchestrator are not only provided with the ability to centrally control their WANs but also to manage branch office configuration. The appliances can be deployed with zero-touch installation as well.

Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider9%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise62%
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Dell SD-WAN is ranked 25th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions while FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review. Dell SD-WAN is rated 0.0, while FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". Dell SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform, whereas FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco SD-WAN.

See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.