Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
This product is perfect for small, and mid-range customers who need to pay less, but still, get enterprise-level capabilities.
This solution makes it easy to manage storage, provision new workloads, and scale-up.
The All-Flash models are pretty fast for the vast majority of our remote workloads.
We use replication for disaster recovery (DR), making our DR process much easier.
It has reduced complexity.
We have resolved IT challenges with this solution. It sped up our environment. We went from spinning disk to all-flash, which reduced our footprint.
It has good performance.
We can get almost real-time response times.
All of the administrative tasks are easy and everything is centralized.
It's very stable and it's easy to use.
The solution is quite stable. We haven't had any issues with glitches or bugs.
The solution is very stable.
The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is hardware independent.
It appears to be very stable and very robust.
HPE StoreVirtual is very easy to use from the management console.
The initial setup is straightforward, not a complex procedure.
This product needs to have better integration with enterprise backup solutions and archiving devices.
This solution would be improved with the addition of flexible raid volumes.
We would like to see the concept of Storage Groups brought back to this product line.
I haven't seen the roadmap for this solution.
It is missing some features, like deduplication.
Because we can do synchronous replication between the two sites, this made the setup challenging for this piece. They did not know how to set this up initially. We ended up having to do bidirectional synchronous replication.
I would like them to continue to build on the solution and expand on the functionality, like replication.
We'd like to see a cheaper version of an all-flash array in that footprint.
In our country, Qatar, most of the industry isn't using too much HP. StoreVirtual doesn't move fast. It's not a popular product.
It is a costly solution.
The management aspect of the solution needs to be improved in order to make the product stronger.
The initial setup could be simplified to make it easier for new users.
The solution needs to ensure it is on par with the industry in terms of availability of features and various other options.
One of the areas that need improvement is the consolidated management platform, to manage all of the nodes from one place and the licensing around that.
I would like to have this solution easily integrate with VMware.
Hardware and disk failures are happening frequently.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Our CAPEX was close to $42,000 and operating costs are below $1000.
Our costs are roughly $200,000 a year.
The solution is extremely functional for the price that we pay for it. It is worth the investment.
We purchased a five-year warranty.
Compression is making a difference towards the amount of hardware that we need to purchase.
The return on the investment was simply speeding up our entire vSphere stack, which allowed our developers and engineers to get their workloads done faster and simpler. We were experiencing VM snapshot times of 45 minutes to two or three hours, and it shrunk it down to under five minutes.
It scales, but then you have to buy additional stuff.
With the large Unity that we bought, it has saved us about one and a half rack space. That's our return on investment on our flash array. We also need less Fibre Channel connectivity.
It costs less than $10,000 for one machine. If it costs more than 15% higher than this, then the customer may change to another solution.
For our organization, I believe the cost is 16,000 Euros for a three-year license. It costs a bit more to do the maintenance on our servers as well. It's also on an HP ProLiant server and an organization will need to do the maintenance there also. I believe the price for that is around 2000 Euros a year.
out of 33 in All-Flash Storage Arrays
Average Words per Review
out of 40 in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
Average Words per Review
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
|EMC Unity||HPE StoreVirtual, HPE VSA|
|Dell EMC||Hewlett Packard Enterprise|
Dell EMC Unity, powered by Intel Xeon processors, delivers the ultimate in simplicity and value, enabling your organization to speed deployment, streamline management and seamlessly tier storage to the cloud.
Dell EMC Unity’s All-Flash and Hybrid Flash storage platforms optimize SSD performance and efficiency, with fully integrated SAN and NAS capabilities. Cloud-based storage analytics and proactive support keep you available and connected.
HPE StoreVirtual storage ensures that organisations can optimise the benefits of server virtualisation with cost-effective high availability and disaster recovery. The iSCSI-based, scale-out storage platform is easy to manage and change – meeting ongoing business demands without creating IT bottlenecks or application downtime. Overcoming the cost and management limitations of traditional storage area networks (SANs), HPE StoreVirtual nodes use storage clustering to form a single pool of resources that enable organisations to buy only what they need today, scaling non-disruptively to meet requirements in the future.
Learn more about Dell EMC Unity
Learn more about HPE StoreVirtual
Information Not Available
|NBrIX, WIND Telecom, Netrics|
Financial Services Firm21%
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider11%
Software R&D Company23%
Comms Service Provider12%