We performed a comparison between Dell Vscale Architecture and IBM VersaStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure."Vscale's scalability is super good. Vscale's scalability, manageability, and performance are all three areas that I emphasize when I sell Vscale Architectures to the customer."
"The solution has high IOPS and the I/O is important because it gives us more transactions per second."
"The combination of Cisco's architecture and IBM's flash technology. Cisco provides FI technology which provides one simple architecture. IBM's flash technology is fast."
"Replication and DR implementation became faster."
"In terms of what could be improved, I particularly think the scope of automation is very much limited. So they should introduce some more STK's and API's for automation first thing."
"The solution should improve deduplication to get a lot of savings."
"Raw data mapping for storage should be a given option."
Earn 20 points
Dell Vscale Architecture is ranked 9th in Converged Infrastructure while IBM VersaStack is ranked 8th in Converged Infrastructure with 3 reviews. Dell Vscale Architecture is rated 8.0, while IBM VersaStack is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell Vscale Architecture writes "Intuitive, robust, manageable, and agile ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM VersaStack writes "A very high IOPS that gives more I/O transactions per second". Dell Vscale Architecture is most compared with Dell VxBlock System and FlexPod XCS, whereas IBM VersaStack is most compared with Dell VxBlock System.
See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.