Dell PowerEdge M vs Super Micro SuperBlade comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
3,702 views|2,454 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Super Micro Logo
1,107 views|914 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dell PowerEdge M and Super Micro SuperBlade based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature of Dell PowerEdge M is iDRAC.""The initial setup is straightforward.""I have compared Dell EMC to other solutions and have found it to be good. The SAN and LAN traffic, manageability, and upgradability are all good.""The networking features for administration and working with the server are valuable.""The solution offers remarkable flexibility, reliability, and extensive software support.""The solution's most valuable features are centralized monitoring and management and the ease of upgrading firmware.""The solution integrated well."

More Dell PowerEdge M Pros →

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature.""The ability to save resource is a key feature.""The initial setup was straightforward."

More Super Micro SuperBlade Pros →

Cons
"Dell PowerEdge M needs to run AMD CPUs on it.""It requires time to transition to the new generation.""I would like to have additional HPC and AI capabilities on general Dell PowerEdge servers.""In terms of improvement, it should also offer a hyper-converged option.""There is room for improvement in scalability.""The set up is complex""The firmware updates for the product need improvement.""We have had some issues with the vendor's support that we have received. When you open up a support case with Dell they send a partner to assist you and in our experience, they are lacking knowledge about the solution. There are times when you need professional support from the vendor that knows the solution well."

More Dell PowerEdge M Cons →

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now.""The solution does not scale well.""There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

More Super Micro SuperBlade Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was budget friendly."
  • "If we would not have gone with the vendor we might have been charged unnecessarily for packages we did not need."
  • "Dell PowerEdge M price is comparable to other solutions but cheaper than IBM. However, the IBM solution is a higher grade solution whereas Dell PowerEdge M is a medium-level solution."
  • "The pricing of PowerEdge Next is higher than it was before."
  • "The product is neither expensive nor cheap. It is manageable for medium enterprises as well."
  • "The solution's pricing is slightly higher."
  • More Dell PowerEdge M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It helps us to manage multiple chassis from a single website.
    Top Answer:The product is neither expensive nor cheap. It is manageable for medium enterprises as well.
    Top Answer:The firmware updates for the product need improvement.
    Top Answer:I think the IPMI is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,702
    Comparisons
    2,454
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    519
    Rating
    8.7
    8th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    1,107
    Comparisons
    914
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    367
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SuperBlade
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Dell PowerEdge M-Series blade servers address the challenges of an evolving IT environment by delivering leading enterprise classfeatures and functionality. The M-Series delivers a unique array of options configured to meet the needs of your IT environment both now and in the future.

    • Multiple blade form-factor choices.
    • Long life cycle providing better life cycle management and improved TCO.
    • Modular I/O switches for future scalability.
    • Breakthrough fan technologies for reduction in power consumption.
    • Configuration management via chassis management controller.
    • Persistent MAC/WWN/iSCSI addresses in a switch-agnostic environment.
    Super Micro's SuperBlade blade servers offer many unique advantages that differentiate it from competitors' blade products and traditional rack-mount solutions. Customer benefits include maximum density, affordability, reduced management costs, lower power consumption, optimal ROI, and high scalability - and in most applications, blade servers would reduce system acquisition costs. While other blade suppliers only offer general-purpose blade servers, the SuperBlade family enables full optimization for a wide array of mission-critical and compute-intensive applications. With in-house design engineering agility to accommodate customer needs rapidly, SuperBlade revolutionizes modular computing architecture by offering several advanced application-optimized models such as Enterprise Blade Server, Data Center Optimized Blade, Workstation Blade and Office Blade.
    Sample Customers
    Newport City Homes, Neuroblastoma and Medulloblastoma Translational Research Consortium (NMTRC), Georgian College, AgreeYa Solutions, IIHT Cloud Solutions, Arizona State University, AudienceScience, University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Holy Cross School
    Prace
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 14 reviews while Super Micro SuperBlade is ranked 8th in Blade Servers with 4 reviews. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.4, while Super Micro SuperBlade is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "Average pricing and good feature sets but is complex to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Super Micro SuperBlade writes "Easy to set up with good technical support but does not scale well". Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE BladeSystem and Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series, whereas Super Micro SuperBlade is most compared with Pure Storage FlashBlade, HPE Integrity, HPE BladeSystem, Cisco UCS B-Series and Cisco UCS E-Series Servers.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.