We performed a comparison between Delphix and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Test Data Management."Delphix can do data masking in any format. Not many solutions can do that."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable aspect is the product is easy to manage, with a good dashboard. We can easily configure it on the front end and back end."
"The most valuable feature is creating virtual databases."
"Data being available anytime is a life changer."
"The product is efficient in handling large volumes of data."
"It provides the ability to roll back to a point in time or roll forward without the assistance of a DBA."
"The most valuable feature is VDB provisioning."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"As a commercial model, it's very good. However, maybe it would be nice for Delphix to integrate with some other platforms."
"My only complaint about this solution is the price."
"Delphix could be improved with better usability and an agentless option."
"When it comes to unstructured and structured data, if Delphix can comply with the requirements for most of the structured data, it would be good, especially if it can include the data scanning part."
"The solution's price needs improvement."
"Could be improved with richer reporting capabilities."
"This product should be extended and made to be a more comprehensive storage solution."
"Delphix is a strong solution for virtualization, but it's not strong enough for creating data, so we have to use another solution for creating new data."
"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"The cloud capability features need improvement."
"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."
"It requires some maintenance."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
Delphix is ranked 1st in Test Data Management with 15 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Delphix is rated 8.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Delphix writes "Handles large volumes of data with ease, but the self-service portal must be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Delphix is most compared with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Denodo, Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) and Actifio, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.